1986
DOI: 10.1080/00103628609367796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of elemental sulfur, gypsum and ammonium thiosulfate as sulfur sources on yield of rapeseed

Abstract: A growth chamber experiment was conducted to compare ammonium thiosulfate, gypsum and elemental sulfur in the form of Agrisul as sources of sulfur for rapeseed (Brassica napus var.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dispersion of an elemental S prill followed by mixing (incorporation) into soil was reported to enhance oxidation and availability (Swan et al 1986). This can be obtained by surface-broadcast application of elemental S in the previous autumn leaving granules on surface to physically break down over the winter by freezing-thawing and wetting-drying cycles, followed by shallow cultivation to incorporate fine S particles into the soil in the following spring to increase their dispersion into soil prior to seeding (Nyborg et al 1980;Solberg et al 2003).…”
Section: Timing Of S Application (Autumn Spring Growing Season)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersion of an elemental S prill followed by mixing (incorporation) into soil was reported to enhance oxidation and availability (Swan et al 1986). This can be obtained by surface-broadcast application of elemental S in the previous autumn leaving granules on surface to physically break down over the winter by freezing-thawing and wetting-drying cycles, followed by shallow cultivation to incorporate fine S particles into the soil in the following spring to increase their dispersion into soil prior to seeding (Nyborg et al 1980;Solberg et al 2003).…”
Section: Timing Of S Application (Autumn Spring Growing Season)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very low recovery from banded and nested than incorporated Flowable S and Fine S was considered to be the result of a decrease in surface area exposed to soil. Other researchers also have shown much higher oxidation rates when elemental S was mixed into soil rather than banded (Chein, Friesen, and Hamilton 1988;Swan, Soper, and Morden 1986). Generally smaller recovery from nested than banded S (Table 6) could also be explained by further reduction in exposure of surface in nested S. Significantly more recovery from banded Flowable S than Fine S (Table 5), although both showed similar recovery with incorporation, was likely due to a relatively wider band (8 mm) for Flowable S compared to a narrower band (4 -5 mm) for Fine S. Although broadcasting of Flowable S reduced the recovery compared with incorporation, it still gave high recovery (Table 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The "right" time to apply S-containing fertilizers is considered to be the sowing period, which ensures maximum canola yield [77]. A more appropriate approach for applying S-SO 2− 4 fertilizers is side-banding, and for S 0 fertilizer is broadcast-incorporation [18,78]. Notably, "right" and long-term S fertilization in S-deficient soils can increase soil carbon sequestration [79], which is important for sustainable use of agricultural land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%