2004
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Electronic Scaffolding for Technology Integration on Perceived Task Effort and Confidence of Primary Student Teachers

Abstract: Forty-one primary student teachers were divided into two groups and were instructed how to integrate certain Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools in learning activities. Only one group was guided to use Filamentality, a fill-in-the-blank interactive Web site, and to organize Internet information in a Hotlist and a Scrapbcok. Questionnaires were administered to collect data related to students' perceived task effort (PTE) as a result of integrating ICT in the learning environment, and their conf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings showed that in Phase 3 children in both scaffolding groups outperformed the children in the Control group on the holistic measurement of computational thinking and the skill of sequencing. These results are consistent with previous work by Jonassen (1992) and more contemporary work by Angeli and Valanides (2004b) that showed the necessity of using scaffolding techniques, such as, external memory systems, to facilitate young students' learning with technological tools. However, when the external memory systems were withdrawn during Phase 4, no significant differences were detected between the scaffolding groups and the Control group on the holistic measurement of computational thinking and the skill of sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings showed that in Phase 3 children in both scaffolding groups outperformed the children in the Control group on the holistic measurement of computational thinking and the skill of sequencing. These results are consistent with previous work by Jonassen (1992) and more contemporary work by Angeli and Valanides (2004b) that showed the necessity of using scaffolding techniques, such as, external memory systems, to facilitate young students' learning with technological tools. However, when the external memory systems were withdrawn during Phase 4, no significant differences were detected between the scaffolding groups and the Control group on the holistic measurement of computational thinking and the skill of sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Only FDI was found to be a statistically significant main effect in Phase 4, indicating that FI children were better in computational thinking than FD learners. This finding is consistent with previous research, which showed that FI learners outperformed the FD learners in self-directed problem-solving tasks and that FD learners needed support and scaffolding to succeed (Angeli & Valanides, 2004a, 2004b. In conclusion, the findings of this study strongly indicate that FD learners need scaffolding to succeed in problem-solving tasks with robotics and that teachers need to consider learners' cognitive type to ensure that all learners can learn with robots during classroom activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The findings showed that in Phase 3 children in both scaffolding groups outperformed the children in the Control group on the holistic measurement of computational thinking and the skill of sequencing. These results are consistent with previous work by Jonassen (1992) and more contemporary work by Angeli and Valanides (2004b) that showed the necessity of using scaffolding techniques, such as, external memory systems, to facilitate young students' learning with technological tools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This echoes the findings for integrating strategy instruction with the use of a computer tool to facilitate the writing process (Cochran-Smith, 1991;MacArthur & Graham, 1993;MacArthur et al, 1995). However, Angeli and Valanides (2004) noted less perceived task effort when using a technologybased scaffold in learning how to integrate information and communication technology tools in instruction. Students in the current study perceived increased effort in using electronic resources in their writing activity that included Internet resources, coupled with their preference for using them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Although low efficacy may be associated with more time on task (Kuo et al, 2004), alternatively, students with a higher selfperception are more likely to be successful learners and therefore may expend more effort and experience to ensure better learning success (Bialo & Sivin-Kachala, 1996). Angeli and Valanides' (2004) study of 41 primary student teachers enrolled in a course on how to integrate information and communication technology tools found that the group who was provided instruction on using Filiamentality, a Web site that supports learners in doing Web searches and gathering information, reported less perceived task effort in use of the Internet and Hyperstudio. In addition, those student teachers instructed on use of Filiamentality had more confidence in their use of the information and communication technology tools than those who did not have the instruction.…”
Section: Quality Of Writing and Effort Expended When Using Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%