1970
DOI: 10.1021/j100697a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of electron, positive ion, and hydrogen atom scavengers on the yields of atomic and molecular hydrogen in the radiolysis of liquid cyclohexane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the four electron scavengers studied here neither react with hydrogen atoms nor undergo energy transfer other than electron capture,2'3•17 one can safely assume that some of the hydrogen has ionic precursors. In 2,2,4-trimethylpentane such a decrease of the hydrogen yield with increasing electron scavenger concentration (SF6 and N20) has been already observed by Iida, et alfi As previously shown,3 the hydrogen production by ionic processes can be represented by the following scheme RH+ + e-->e(H, H2) (1) e~-f-S -> -s- RH+ + S--> e'(H, H2) (3) where e and e' are efficiencies for production of hydrogen from reactions 1 and 3 because the hydrogen atoms produced finally give hydrogen by abstracting a hydrogen atom from the solvent. In the case of cyclohexane, it has been shown that the efficiency of hydrogen production from reaction 3, i.e., e', is zero or nearly so.3 Since hydrogen production from 2,2,4-trimethylpentane is a much less efficient process than from cyclohexane ((7(H2) = 2.44 and 5.67, respectively), it should be expected that e' would be equal to zero in 2,2,4-trimethylpentane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the four electron scavengers studied here neither react with hydrogen atoms nor undergo energy transfer other than electron capture,2'3•17 one can safely assume that some of the hydrogen has ionic precursors. In 2,2,4-trimethylpentane such a decrease of the hydrogen yield with increasing electron scavenger concentration (SF6 and N20) has been already observed by Iida, et alfi As previously shown,3 the hydrogen production by ionic processes can be represented by the following scheme RH+ + e-->e(H, H2) (1) e~-f-S -> -s- RH+ + S--> e'(H, H2) (3) where e and e' are efficiencies for production of hydrogen from reactions 1 and 3 because the hydrogen atoms produced finally give hydrogen by abstracting a hydrogen atom from the solvent. In the case of cyclohexane, it has been shown that the efficiency of hydrogen production from reaction 3, i.e., e', is zero or nearly so.3 Since hydrogen production from 2,2,4-trimethylpentane is a much less efficient process than from cyclohexane ((7(H2) = 2.44 and 5.67, respectively), it should be expected that e' would be equal to zero in 2,2,4-trimethylpentane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…One can extend to 2,2,4-trimethylpentane the kinetic model recently proposed for cyclohexane. 3 In this model, for a given ethylene concentration, the electron scavenger concentration dependence of the yield of ethyl radicals (measured as ethyl iodide) is given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%