The effect of electromagnetic field on decreasing and increasing of the growth and proliferation rate of dermal fibroblast cell

Naghibzadeh, Mehran; Gholampour, Seifollah; Naghibzadeh, Majid; Sadeghian‐Nodoushan, Fatemeh; Nikukar, Habib

doi:10.1111/dth.13803

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 48 publications

(72 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first practical use of robotics in medical science dates back to 1985 1 . Following these systems' improvement, robotics is used in several fields such as neurosurgery, 2-9 cell biology, 10,11 rehabilitation, 12 orthopedic surgeries, 13,14 laparoscopies, 15 and cardiovascular surgeries. [16][17][18] In recent years, minimally invasive surgery methods have attracted much attention.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Single Port Minimal Invasive Neurosurgical Robots to Ablation and Resection of Brain Tumor

Marvi

Sherafati

Tahery

et al. 2020

Int Clin Neurosci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Using minimally invasive neurosurgical robots is one of the most desirable ablation methods and resection of brain tumors. In this study, forward kinematics and Jacobian matrix calculated for two single-port robots for comparing the effectiveness of two types of single port minimal invasive surgical robots to ablation and resection of brain tumor Methods: The motion analysis of robots type 1 and 2 has compared to each other. Ablation manipulator in robot type 1 has five degrees of freedom, but in robot type 2, three revolute degrees of freedom of this manipulator has replaced with a revolute joint perpendicular to the previous three revolute joints. Results: Results showed that for resection surgery, in the same conditions, robot type 2 damaged 58.9 mm 3 more of cerebral cortex tissue than robot type 1 to resect the brain tumors. To establish a static balance, robot type 2 needs to tolerate at least 41% more internal loading than robot type 1. The maximum velocity for robot type 1 in the contact location between the end-effector and the tumor is 1.7 times more than robot type 2. The maximum end-effector force of robot type 1 to apply the tumor for ablation surgery is more than 1.8 times in robot type 2, but the maximum moment and power for ablation surgery and resection of these two robots were the same less than 1% difference. Conclusion: Despite the more straightforward mechanism, a minimum number of joints, and better kinematics range of robot type 2, robot types 1 has the possibility for transformation, establishes the static balancing, and does a better ablation surgery with less damage to the brain.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Single Port Minimal Invasive Neurosurgical Robots to Ablation and Resection of Brain Tumor

Marvi

Sherafati

Tahery

et al. 2020

Int Clin Neurosci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Naghibzadeh et al, 1 there was an error in assembling the panel "F" of Figure 3. Panel "B" was copied as panel "F".…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%