1996
DOI: 10.1080/07373939608917092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Electric Field on Heat and Mass Transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why the evaporation rate becomes independent of the EHD number is because the effect of corona wind is largely suppressed by the high air velocity (u i ¼ 2.6 m/s). This is different from the result reported by Wolny and Kaniuk [9] in which they show that the water evaporation rate still increases with the applied voltage (i.e., the EHD number) under the cross-flow condition. It is important to note that the maximum crossflow velocity in their study was only 0.25 m/s.…”
Section: Ehd-enhanced Water Evaporation 603contrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason why the evaporation rate becomes independent of the EHD number is because the effect of corona wind is largely suppressed by the high air velocity (u i ¼ 2.6 m/s). This is different from the result reported by Wolny and Kaniuk [9] in which they show that the water evaporation rate still increases with the applied voltage (i.e., the EHD number) under the cross-flow condition. It is important to note that the maximum crossflow velocity in their study was only 0.25 m/s.…”
Section: Ehd-enhanced Water Evaporation 603contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…These include the work of Sadek et al, [7] Wolny, [8] Wolny and Kaniuk [9] as well as Barthakur and Arnold. [10] However, the previous studies on EHD-enhanced water evaporation were either limited to a particular electrode (mostly a needle electrode [8][9][10] ) or a discharge polarity (negative corona [7] and positive corona [8,9] ). The main objective of the present study is to investigate the effect of corona wind on the water evaporation rate using wire and needle electrodes in both positive and negative polarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Large discrepancies were found when using the correlations of Wangnipparnto et al [11] and Karami et al [12], mainly because of the absence in the Sherwood or Nusselt number correlations, as well as the difference in the electrode system. In contrast, the simulated droplet diameter using the Wolny's [10] correlation agreed well with the experimental data because of the comprehensive consideration in the heat and mass transfer enhancement under the electric field. Thus, the Wolny's correlation [10] was selected in the present simulation of R134a charged droplet.…”
Section: supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Afterwards, further development and explanation of this phenomenon were made by researchers, where the macroscopic effect of the corona wind generation [8] and the microscopic effect of the orientational alignment of fluid molecules [9] induced by an electric field were widely regarded as the primary enhancement mechanism. For the former mechanism, several enhancement factor correlations [10][11][12] for the Nusselt and Sherwood numbers were proposed to evaluate the heat and mass transfer enhanced by the electric field. The objective of the present work is improving the traditional droplet evaporation model by considering the heat and mass transfer enhancement by the corona wind, droplet fragment by the Coulomb repulsion and droplet motion under the electric field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in early paper [21] that distilled water evaporated much faster in the presence of a high-voltage electric field in the direction normal to the water surface. Some details about the "Asakawa effect" and its applications can be found in [22][23][24][25]. Unfortunately, it is difficult to measure local increase in water evaporation in a small hot region just below the cluster.…”
Section: Experimental Results On Behavior Of Droplet Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%