2005
DOI: 10.2527/2005.834933x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of early weaning on feedlot performance and measures of stress in beef calves1,2

Abstract: Forty crossbred steers (Brahman x English) were categorized into two groups: 1) early weaned (EW; n = 20); and 2) normal weaned (NW; n = 20). Calves were 89 and 300 d of age at the time of EW and NW, respectively; SEM = 4.4. Early-weaned calves were kept on-site (University of Florida, Ona), provided supplement (1% of BW), and grazed on annual and perennial pastures until NW. At the time of normal weaning, all calves were loaded on a commercial livestock trailer and transported to the North Carolina State Univ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
76
2
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
11
76
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilising pasture in a 15-mo bull production system can reduce the overall costs of production, but this also presents the challenge of achieving the required market specifications. Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of calf nutrition on performance during the finishing period, many of those studies focussed on the influence of pre-weaning nutrition (Arthington et al, 2005;Wolcott et al, 2010). Wolcott et al (2010) reported that suckled Shorthorn calves weaned at 259 d of age were 17 kg heavier at the start of the finishing period and had 18 kg greater carcass weight at 23 mo of age compared to those weaned at 123 d of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilising pasture in a 15-mo bull production system can reduce the overall costs of production, but this also presents the challenge of achieving the required market specifications. Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of calf nutrition on performance during the finishing period, many of those studies focussed on the influence of pre-weaning nutrition (Arthington et al, 2005;Wolcott et al, 2010). Wolcott et al (2010) reported that suckled Shorthorn calves weaned at 259 d of age were 17 kg heavier at the start of the finishing period and had 18 kg greater carcass weight at 23 mo of age compared to those weaned at 123 d of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolcott et al (2010) reported that suckled Shorthorn calves weaned at 259 d of age were 17 kg heavier at the start of the finishing period and had 18 kg greater carcass weight at 23 mo of age compared to those weaned at 123 d of age. Arthington et al (2005) 2009), the 15-mo bull production system is dependent on high levels of concentrate input. Consequently, the proportion of grazed grass in the feed budget is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, other usual functions of the liver, such as gluconeogenesis (Elsasser et al, 2000), bilirubin excretion (Assenat et al, 2004) and others, can be reduced. Thus, among the mechanisms of the well known negative effects of inflammations, mainly when they are prolonged, the changes in liver functionality could be of great interest and could be useful markers of a chronic stress condition ("disease" stress) in dairy cows (Bertoni, 1999;Bertoni et al, 2008;Lomborg et al, 2008) as well as in beef cattle (Arthington et al, 2003;Arthington et al, 2005) and in pigs (Piñeiro et al, 2007). In particular, the -APP represent promising indicators of chronic stress/reduced welfare during the transition period, as demonstrated in various experiments (Bertoni et al, 2006a;Bionaz et al, 2007;Bertoni et al, 2008), because they are linked to the effects of prolonged and severe inflammation, which cause their marked reduction and reduced level of welfare.…”
Section: Biochemical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, age at weaning and level of nutrition affect the cellular (Pollock et al, 1993) and humoral immune responses of young calves (Pollock et al, 1994) and may influence their general stress response. In fact, early-weaned calves were more tolerant to stressors associated with transport and feedlot entry than their traditionally weaned counterparts (Arthington et al, 2005). Stress response may also be influenced by breed, because genetic factors can be important in the neuroendocrine and metabolic adaptation to stressing conditions (García-Belenguer et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%