1999
DOI: 10.1097/00019501-199906000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of early postinfarction revascularization of asymptomatic patients on left ventricular remodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of remodelling was demonstrated after revascularisation of totally occluded infarct related arteries, whereas left ventricular dilatation was observed in patients with patent though stenosed infarct related arteries. 28 In our study, the occurrence of inducible ischaemia during DSE after uncomplicated myocardial infarction clearly identified patients with left ventricular enlargement at six months, and with a higher risk of major end diastolic volume increase (> 15 ml/m 2 ) (fig 3).…”
Section: Inducible Ischaemia and Remodellingsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Absence of remodelling was demonstrated after revascularisation of totally occluded infarct related arteries, whereas left ventricular dilatation was observed in patients with patent though stenosed infarct related arteries. 28 In our study, the occurrence of inducible ischaemia during DSE after uncomplicated myocardial infarction clearly identified patients with left ventricular enlargement at six months, and with a higher risk of major end diastolic volume increase (> 15 ml/m 2 ) (fig 3).…”
Section: Inducible Ischaemia and Remodellingsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The effect of IRA reopening is still debated, the benefits demonstrated in previous studies have not been proved unequivocally in clinical practice [9–12,21]. While some authors reported a significant improvement in the LV function following coronary angioplasty performed several days or even weeks after MI others demonstrated no beneficial effects or an even worse outcome, related to a high rate of peri‐procedural complications that might offset potential benefits [33–37].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%