2011
DOI: 10.7748/phc2011.06.21.5.28.c8549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of e-learning on student placement in the community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They therefore encourage researchers to examine these tools in order to reveal new instructional designs that make use of this technology. A review of the existing literature (Gao et al, 2012;Reynolds and Fell, 2011;Reupert and Dalgarno, 2011;Erdem, 2008) shows evidence that digital technologies can facilitate the flow of learning from formal to informal contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They therefore encourage researchers to examine these tools in order to reveal new instructional designs that make use of this technology. A review of the existing literature (Gao et al, 2012;Reynolds and Fell, 2011;Reupert and Dalgarno, 2011;Erdem, 2008) shows evidence that digital technologies can facilitate the flow of learning from formal to informal contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 As with students in higher education, health staff who participate in this type of learning for continued professional development are able to control their own learning outcomes whilst also engaging with mentors who can augment the learning process through direct support and supervision. 16 Instructors are also better able to exploit the relative advantages of both the e-learning and face-to-face components. However, in order to be truly successful, blended learning requires strong coordination of both components, including which aspects of the course are best suited to each learning environment.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 21 articles selected for inclusion were published between 2003 and 2019. The majority of studies were of mixed methods design, combining both qualitative and quantitative research methods (19/21), whereas two studies used qualitative methodology (Reynolds & Fell, 2011; Tan et al, 2010). All studies except two included clearly defined aims and objectives (Andrews et al, 2010; McLeod et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over half of the studies involved specific activities being set for students to complete (12/21). These included tasks such as creating a blog post (Ladyshewsky & Gardner, 2008; Lin & Shen, 2013; Tan et al, 2010; Wiid et al, 2013); submitting case studies for discussion (Wooster, 2004); problem‐based learning activities (Denny & Higgins, 2003; Lea & Callaghan, 2011; Morris & Maynard, 2010; Reynolds & Fell, 2011); and participation in videoconferencing tutorials (Andrews et al, 2010; Furness & Kaltner, 2015; Hardy et al, 2016). A few studies clearly used strategies/platforms that provided notifications to remind students to contribute (4/21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%