2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30423-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of dulaglutide on stroke: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst dulaglutide reduced the incidence of ischaemic stroke, it did not affect stroke severity. 60 Post-hoc analysis of CVOT trial data has identified sub-groups which may potentially derive greater…”
Section: Stroke Risk In Cardiovascular Outcome (Safety) Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst dulaglutide reduced the incidence of ischaemic stroke, it did not affect stroke severity. 60 Post-hoc analysis of CVOT trial data has identified sub-groups which may potentially derive greater…”
Section: Stroke Risk In Cardiovascular Outcome (Safety) Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 5 13 14 In the same period GLP-1a, first approved in 2005, proved to be CV safe, reduced CV events and showed potential renal benefits. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Gliptins already showed CV safety in 2013, and the evidence was strengthened from 2015 to 2019, and showed renal safety. [23][24][25][26] This new evidence led to significant changes in the guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REWIND investigated the effect of dulaglutide in a population in which 68.5% (6793 patients) had not established CVD [19], and reported a 13% risk reduction of 3P-MACE (non-significant) in the multiple risk factors population [11,19]. A recent exploratory analysis [42] of REWIND reported a significantly reduced risk of non-fatal stroke (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.61-0.95]; p = 0.017) and ischaemic stroke (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.59-0.94); p = 0.0115), and no significant effects on fatal stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, or stroke of unknown type when comparing dulaglutide to placebo [42]. When analysing this in context of primary prevention, a significant effect was only observed for participants with previous CVD, however, a non-significant risk reduction of 20% (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.61-1.06]) was observed in primary prevention [42].…”
Section: Primary Care In Diabetes Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent exploratory analysis [42] of REWIND reported a significantly reduced risk of non-fatal stroke (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.61-0.95]; p = 0.017) and ischaemic stroke (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.59-0.94); p = 0.0115), and no significant effects on fatal stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, or stroke of unknown type when comparing dulaglutide to placebo [42]. When analysing this in context of primary prevention, a significant effect was only observed for participants with previous CVD, however, a non-significant risk reduction of 20% (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.61-1.06]) was observed in primary prevention [42]. Even though more studies are needed on the potential benefits of GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2is in a primary prevention population [43,44], this is a first step towards making CVOTs, their outcomes and medications tested relevant for both broad primary and secondary prevention populations, and thus both, specialist and primary care physicians.…”
Section: Primary Care In Diabetes Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%