2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01526-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of dot size in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements

Abstract: Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the size of the dots in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements. Methods: A stereopsis measurement system was created using a phoropter and two 4 K smartphones. Three dot sizes, including 1 × 1 pixel, 6 × 6 pixels, and 10 × 10 pixels (equivalent to 0.17 min arc, 1 min arc, and 1.68 min arc, respectively), were used to form random-dot arrays, and each test pattern had one Lea symbol hidden within it. The resulting stereograms were… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In clinical practice, Open access stereopsis used to detect a contour-based stereo target such as the TST is considered to be 'local', while the stereopsis to detect a random dot-based stereo target such as the TNO is considered to be 'global'. [28][29][30][31] For calculating the viewing angle, the length of the TNO on the ocular fundus was 2.5 mm and that of the TST was 0.2 mm. Since the BRVO lesion size was larger than length of the TST on the ocular fundus, TNO, which is a type of 'global' stereopsis, might be associated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, Open access stereopsis used to detect a contour-based stereo target such as the TST is considered to be 'local', while the stereopsis to detect a random dot-based stereo target such as the TNO is considered to be 'global'. [28][29][30][31] For calculating the viewing angle, the length of the TNO on the ocular fundus was 2.5 mm and that of the TST was 0.2 mm. Since the BRVO lesion size was larger than length of the TST on the ocular fundus, TNO, which is a type of 'global' stereopsis, might be associated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dot size unlikely accounted for the difference in thresholds between the TNO and the other stereo tests in Vancleef's study [ 14 ]. The dot size of the TNO was larger than that of many other random dot stereopsis used in the clinic [ 16 ]. To avoid the effect of dot size, the smallest dot used in our picture was 6 × 6 pixel, which is equivalent to 1 min arc at 65 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 , 36 Stereoacuity was measured using an random dot stereogram chart. 37 Contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured using the quick CSF procedure with a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) grating orientation identification task. 38 40 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%