2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of distraction on change detection in crowded acoustic scenes

Abstract: In this series of behavioural experiments we investigated the effect of distraction on the maintenance of acoustic scene information in short-term memory. Stimuli are artificial acoustic ‘scenes’ composed of several (up to twelve) concurrent tone-pip streams (‘sources’). A gap (1000 ms) is inserted partway through the ‘scene’; Changes in the form of an appearance of a new source or disappearance of an existing source, occur after the gap in 50% of the trials. Listeners were instructed to monitor the unfolding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, sound is often what alerts us to important changes around us -in many cases we hear a change before we see it. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that (young) listeners are sensitive to abrupt changes, such as the appearance or disappearance of a source, even in heavily populated acoustic scenes ( Cervantes Constantino et al, 2012 ;Pavani and Turatto, 2008 ;Petsas et al, 2016 ). Brain responses, recorded from naïve distracted listeners reveal that these events are often detected in the absence of directed attention Chait, 2016a , 2016b ), consistent with an, at least partially, automatic change detection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, sound is often what alerts us to important changes around us -in many cases we hear a change before we see it. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that (young) listeners are sensitive to abrupt changes, such as the appearance or disappearance of a source, even in heavily populated acoustic scenes ( Cervantes Constantino et al, 2012 ;Pavani and Turatto, 2008 ;Petsas et al, 2016 ). Brain responses, recorded from naïve distracted listeners reveal that these events are often detected in the absence of directed attention Chait, 2016a , 2016b ), consistent with an, at least partially, automatic change detection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To estimate the perceived saliency of the sounds, two participants from the main fMRI experiment and four new participants (two female; mean age ​= ​29 years, SD ​= ​4) completed a short behavioral session similar in procedure to Petsas et al. (2016) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the perceived saliency of the sounds, two participants from 170 the main fMRI experiment and four new participants (two female; mean age = 171 29 years, SD = 4) completed a short behavioral session similar in procedure to 172Petsas et al (2016). These participants listened to all pairwise combinations of 173 the nine sounds (eight pairs for each of the nine sounds; separated by 200 ms 174 of silence) and were asked to judge on each trial which of the two sounds was 175 more salient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%