2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-008-0425-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Disorder on Polymer Depinning Transitions

Abstract: Abstract. We consider a polymer, with monomer locations modeled by the trajectory of a Markov chain, in the presence of a potential that interacts with the polymer when it visits a particular site 0. We assume that probability of an excursion of length n is given by n −c ϕ(n) for some 1 < c < 2 and slowly varying ϕ. Disorder is introduced by having the interaction vary from one monomer to another, as a constant u plus i.i.d. mean-0 randomness. There is a critical value of u above which the polymer is pinned, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
339
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
339
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…n } i∈N are IID random variables and therefore this dynamical system is naturally re-interpreted as the evolution of the probability law L n (the law of R (1) n ): given L n , the law L n+1 is obtained by constructing two IID variables distributed according to L n and applying…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n } i∈N are IID random variables and therefore this dynamical system is naturally re-interpreted as the evolution of the probability law L n (the law of R (1) n ): given L n , the law L n+1 is obtained by constructing two IID variables distributed according to L n and applying…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist several proofs of Theorem 2.1, with very different techniques: a second moment method in [1,39], martingale techniques in [34], and a large deviation/variational formula approach in [17]. The case α = 0 is studied in depth in [5]: the annealed and quenched critical points are equal, whatever β is.…”
Section: Results In the Iid Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his seminal paper, Harris [32] explains that disorder relevance can be decided only through the order ν hom of the homogeneous phase transition: the correlation length of the homogeneous system diverges as |h − h c | −ν hom +o (1) as h approaches h c (a precise definition of the order of the phase transition is given in the context of pinning model, see (5)). Harris predicts that an IID disorder is relevant if ν hom < 2/d and irrelevant if ν hom > 2/d.…”
Section: The Harris Criterion For General Disordered Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have pointed out, this was to be expected: can one still extract from (4.2) some interesting information? The answer is positive, as shown by K. Alexander in [4]. The crucial point is not to take the limit in N , but rather exploit (4.2) up to the scale of the correlation length of the annealed system, which is just a homogeneous system with pinning potential δ (see Remark 2.4).…”
Section: Free Energy Lower Bounds and Irrelevant Disorder Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results in Theorem 3.6 are almost sharp, because in [4,54] it is proven that for every K(·) such that α ∈ (1/2, 1) there exists C > 0 such that…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%