2020
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of different treatments of moss layer transfer technique on plant functional types' biomass in revegetated milled peatlands

Abstract: The number and the area of former milled peatlands under restoration have increased rapidly in the Northern Hemisphere in recent decades with the primary aim of promoting peat accumulation. However, the application of similar restoration techniques across different sites does not always lead to desired results, and some site-specific modifications may be needed. This study aimed to evaluate the response of aboveground plant biomass on three experimental sites in northern Estonia to different restoration techni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species diversity was remarkably similar among natural, unrestored, and restored sites, even though unrestored sites yielded slightly fewer species. As in other studies with the present ecosystem (González and Rochefort, 2014;Purre et al, 2020), we show that low vegetation strata can recover in a matter of a few years after peat extraction has ceased, and that this recovery is facilitated by restoration in the case of moss and herbaceous (mostly sedges) strata (Rochefort et al, 2013). Moreover, we added support to the finding by Desrochers et al (1998) that tree cover overshot in old unrestored sites that of nearby undisturbed sites, a phenomenon linked to the regional establishment of grey birch (Betula populifolia) in disturbed bogs (Lavoie and Saint-Louis, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Species diversity was remarkably similar among natural, unrestored, and restored sites, even though unrestored sites yielded slightly fewer species. As in other studies with the present ecosystem (González and Rochefort, 2014;Purre et al, 2020), we show that low vegetation strata can recover in a matter of a few years after peat extraction has ceased, and that this recovery is facilitated by restoration in the case of moss and herbaceous (mostly sedges) strata (Rochefort et al, 2013). Moreover, we added support to the finding by Desrochers et al (1998) that tree cover overshot in old unrestored sites that of nearby undisturbed sites, a phenomenon linked to the regional establishment of grey birch (Betula populifolia) in disturbed bogs (Lavoie and Saint-Louis, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Initial hydrological properties, peat degradation, nutrient status and restoration approach are likely to affect the revegetation and hydrological responses to increased water table. This would likely affect restoration trajectory and, subsequently, GHG fluxes over time (Nugent et al, 2019;Purre et al, 2020). Higher nutrient availability associated with fens might lead to a faster and more dynamic response to rewetting.…”
Section: Theoretical Effect Of Rewetting Forested Peatlands On Greenh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final composition will likely be a function of nutrient content and pH (Laine et al, 2021). There is evidence of effective restoration of ecological properties through rewetting (Menberu et al, 2016;Alderson et al, 2019;Ahmad et al, 2020;Purre et al, 2020), but this process might require up to 30 years and for some systems might not be possible due to changes associated with long term drainage (Holden et al, 2004;Kreyling et al, 2021).…”
Section: Restoration Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following peatland restoration, we should expect, among others, a typical plant cover dominated by Sphagnum mosses, carbon sequestration, typical hydrological conditions and, resistance and resilience to fire. If the effectiveness of peatland restoration has been well documented and assessed regarding the carbon storage function (Järveoja et al 2016; Strack et al 2016; Nugent et al 2018), characteristic vegetation (Poulin et al 2013; González & Rochefort 2014; Karofeld et al 2016, 2020; Purre et al 2020) and the typical hydrological conditions (Ketcheson & Price 2011; McCarter & Price 2013, 2015), the resistance and resilience of restored peatlands to fire has never been evaluated yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%