2013
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2013.911a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Different Textual Narrations on Students’ Explanations at the Submicroscopic Level in Chemistry

Abstract: Terms and conditions for use: By downloading this article from the EURASIA Journal website you agree that it can be used for the following purposes only: educational, instructional, scholarly research, personal use. You also agree that it cannot be redistributed (including emailing to a list-serve or such large groups), reproduced in any form, or published on a website for free or for a fee.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The representation model at this level can be expressed starting from the simple to using computer technology, which is using words, diagrams/images, twodimensional models, three-dimensional models both silent and moving as multi-representation. Symbolic representations are chemical representations qualitatively and quantitatively, namely chemical formulas, diagrams, images, reaction equations, stoichiometry, and mathematical calculations [12] [15].…”
Section: B Chemistry and Chemical Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representation model at this level can be expressed starting from the simple to using computer technology, which is using words, diagrams/images, twodimensional models, three-dimensional models both silent and moving as multi-representation. Symbolic representations are chemical representations qualitatively and quantitatively, namely chemical formulas, diagrams, images, reaction equations, stoichiometry, and mathematical calculations [12] [15].…”
Section: B Chemistry and Chemical Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies before show the low understanding of students in macroscopic representations, the existence of concept misconceptions in submicroscopic representations, and the lack of students' understanding of complexity as outlined in symbolic representations [3]. Students have difficulty in macroscopic representation when faced with a concept that has never been experienced before [4]. Understanding sub-microscopic concepts is considered difficult and abstract so that it is considered to study things that have no meaning [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many students think of abstract constructs in concrete terms and tend not to think beyond a model's surface attributes (Harrison & Treagust, ). Researchers reason that while scientists, as experts, move freely across different multiple representations, and focus on the submicroscopic and conceptual features of scientific models, novices, including students, think at the macroscopic level and focus on the surface features of the models, even if these models are highly theoretical abstract models (Al‐Balushi, ; Barak & Hussein‐Farraj, ; Snir et al, ; Won et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Also, students' achievements in science and mathematics are found to be significantly related to their understanding of models and modeling (Krell et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They face difficulty comprehending that each model represents a specific pattern related to the phenomenon under study and that multiple models together give a more holistic view of the phenomenon (Al‐Balushi, , ; Halloun, ; Nichols et al, ; Snir et al, ; Won et al, ). Research indicates that it is difficult for students as novices to translate across multiple types of representation (e.g., graphs, tables, 2D, 3D) and across multiple levels of representation (i.e., macroscopic, submicroscopic, symbolic; Al‐Balushi, , ; Nichols et al, ; Won et al, ). They are unable to connect different representations to construct a meaningful understanding of a phenomenon and prefer to use a single representation with which they manage to construct accepted interpretations (Won et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%