The Effect of Different Combinations of Surface Treatments and Bonding Agents on the Shear Bond Strength Between Titanium Alloy and Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic

Alkhadashi, Afaf; Güven, Melahat Çelik; Erol, Funda; Yıldırım, Gülhan

doi:10.11607/prd.3893

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because of its warmth sensitivity, Ti has a typically negative reversible ability). Ti and Ti combinations can change effectively, prompting unconstrained re-passivation regardless of whether the obstruction layer gets disturbed ( Koijumi et al., 2019 ; Alkhadashi et al., 2020 ).…”

Section: Properties Of Ti and Ti Alloysmentioning

confidence: 99%

RETRACTED: Titanium and titanium alloys in dentistry: Current trends, recent developments, and future prospects

Hoque¹,

Showva²,

Ahmed³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Properties Of Ti and Ti Alloysmentioning

confidence: 99%

RETRACTED: Titanium and titanium alloys in dentistry: Current trends, recent developments, and future prospects

Hoque¹,

Showva²,

Ahmed³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Previous studies investigating titanium bonding to ceramics reported that mechanical treatments applied to titanium surfaces increase the titanium-ceramic connection. 17 18 19 20 Therefore, Al 2 O 3 air abrasion and tribochemical coating were chosen for the roughening of titanium as they can be applied in dental clinics and small laboratories. The group that did not receive any surface treatment served as a control.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…27 Various studies evaluating the bond strength of resin-based luting agents to titanium are available in the literature. 16 20 29 30 31 32 33 However, different results emerged even in the studies using similar luting agent types. These differences could be due to the primers used, specimen differences in study design, or compositional differences in luting agents, including different ratios of monomers and chemical/light catalysts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of surface treatment and luting agent type on shear bond strength of titanium to ceramic materials

Karaokutan

Özel

2022

J Adv Prosthodont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the effect of different surface treatments and luting agent types on the shear bond strength of two ceramics to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 160 Cp Ti specimens were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 40) according to surface treatments received (control, 50 µm airborne-particle abrasion, 110 µm airborne-particle abrasion, and tribochemical coating). The cementation surfaces of titanium and all-ceramic specimens were treated with a universal primer. Two cubic all-ceramic discs (lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC)) were cemented to titanium using two types of resin-based luting agents: self-cure and dual-cure (n = 10). After cementation, all specimens were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was conducted, and the failure mode was determined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, and the Tukey-HSD test was used for post hoc comparisons ( P < .05). RESULTS Significant differences were found among the groups based on surface treatment, resin-based luting agent, and ceramic type ( P < .05). Among the surface treatments, 50 µm air-abrasion showed the highest SBS, while the control group showed the lowest. SBS was higher for dual-cure resin-based luting agent than self-cure luting agent. ZLC showed better SBS values than LDC. CONCLUSION The cementation of ZLC with dual-cure resin-based luting agent showed better bonding effectiveness to commercially pure titanium treated with 50 µm airborne-particle abrasion.

show abstract

“… Risk of bias for included studies [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

Laboratory Fracture Resilience of Hybrid Abutments Used in Oral Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Favasuli

Mascarenhas

Maurício

2022

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When implants are required in prosthodontics treatment, one of the most important decisions is the choice of the final crown and the type of connection to the implant through the abutment. Hybrid abutments are becoming a primary choice. They are projected and produced with materials whose properties guarantee the required mechanical features (including resistance) and take advantage of the hybrid abutment crown retention between screw and cement. However, a review of the mechanical resistance of the different abutment types and associated materials is still lacking. This review aimed to study the in vitro mechanical efficiency of the hybrid abutments used in oral rehabilitation. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, B-on, and Google Scholar databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: 75 articles were identified from all databases, and 33 were selected after abstract screening. Thus, 21 studies were included in the review after full-text reading. Among the materials used for crowns, lithium disilicate was, aesthetically, the primary choice for its aesthetic and moderate strength. On the other hand, zirconia showed the best fracture resistance. Regarding the different kinds of abutments, there is still some lack of knowledge about the best design. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this systematic review, we can conclude that hybrid pillars are an excellent choice for oral rehabilitation through implants, showing improved resistance when including materials such as zirconia and lithium disilicate.

show abstract

The Effect of Different Combinations of Surface Treatments and Bonding Agents on the Shear Bond Strength Between Titanium Alloy and Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic

Cited by 10 publications

References 1 publication

RETRACTED: Titanium and titanium alloys in dentistry: Current trends, recent developments, and future prospects

RETRACTED: Titanium and titanium alloys in dentistry: Current trends, recent developments, and future prospects

Effect of surface treatment and luting agent type on shear bond strength of titanium to ceramic materials

Laboratory Fracture Resilience of Hybrid Abutments Used in Oral Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About