2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of different assembly loads on taper junction fretting wear in total hip replacements

Abstract: The effect of different assembly loads on taper junction fretting wear in total hip replacements http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/2471/ Article LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of this parameter during wear analysis has already been presented in the previous studies (English et al, 2015(English et al, , 2016. As such, the wear evolution is just presented here for clarity.…”
Section: Finite Element Wear Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variation of this parameter during wear analysis has already been presented in the previous studies (English et al, 2015(English et al, , 2016. As such, the wear evolution is just presented here for clarity.…”
Section: Finite Element Wear Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A previous study has shown that an increase in assembly force results in a reduction in fretting wear (English et al, 2016). It was recommended that a 4 kN initial assembly force is required to minimise the wear rates.…”
Section: Finite Element Wear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An average element edge length of 0.9 mm was found to provide convergence for all test conditions. The contact interaction between the head taper and trunnion was modelled using a finite sliding formulation with a surface‐to‐surface discretization and a constant friction coefficient of 0.21 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “prosim” load profile simulated the loading profile exerted by a hip simulator which applies dual axes rotations, namely, F/E and internal/external rotation . The loads for each of these profiles were applied to a reference point, coupled to the head taper and trunnion surfaces, located in the center of the head [Figure (b)]. For all loading conditions, the assembly was constrained by creating a second reference point in the head center, constraining it in three degrees of translation ( U 1 = U 2 = U 3 = 0) and kinematically coupling it to the bearing surface of the femoral head, thereby precluding the need to include an acetabular liner in the model …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%