2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of different antimicrobial treatment regimens on the faecal shedding of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in horses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Detected rates are in general concordance with previous studies, reporting proportions from 7 to 16% (Maddox et al, 2012;Walther et al, 2018b;Schoster et al, 2020), but lower than in studies using selective enrichment (Shnaiderman-Torban et al, 2020). A very recent study by Schoster et al (2020) on hospitalized horses shedding ESBL-EC included different groups of equine patients while the duration of the PAP or anti-infective antimicrobial courses was determined individually for each patient by the veterinarian in charge. The fecal samples were collected -amongst other times-at hospital admission and 48-60 h afterward (Schoster et al, 2020).…”
Section: Isolation Rates Of Esbl-ec In Specimens Of Equine Patientssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Detected rates are in general concordance with previous studies, reporting proportions from 7 to 16% (Maddox et al, 2012;Walther et al, 2018b;Schoster et al, 2020), but lower than in studies using selective enrichment (Shnaiderman-Torban et al, 2020). A very recent study by Schoster et al (2020) on hospitalized horses shedding ESBL-EC included different groups of equine patients while the duration of the PAP or anti-infective antimicrobial courses was determined individually for each patient by the veterinarian in charge. The fecal samples were collected -amongst other times-at hospital admission and 48-60 h afterward (Schoster et al, 2020).…”
Section: Isolation Rates Of Esbl-ec In Specimens Of Equine Patientssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The fecal samples were collected -amongst other times-at hospital admission and 48-60 h afterward (Schoster et al, 2020). Interestingly, Schoster et al (2020) found no significant difference concerning the ESBL-EC shedding rates in horses receiving either a fourth-generation cephalosporin or the common P/G combination. Although neither the study design nor the study population included by that particular work are directly comparable with the present study, interesting similarities are apparent: An increase in ESBL-EC detection rates reported for samples of hospitalized horses, for instance, are clearly in line with those recorded in the present study, since they have also noted an elevation in detection rates beyond 50% within 3 days after hospital admission.…”
Section: Isolation Rates Of Esbl-ec In Specimens Of Equine Patientsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shedding rates of 3GCRE by healthy horses in farms were reported worldwide, varying from 5.2% to 44% [11][12][13][14][15]. In three different studies, conducted in two different equine hospitals, shedding rates were shown to increase by 2.5-5.1-fold during hospitalization, implying that the nosocomial acquisition and spread of these resistant bacteria is common in certain veterinary facilities [11,16,17]. Moreover, there are numerous reports on various severe and invasive 3GCRE infectious syndromes among horses, e.g., skin and soft tissue infections, surgical site infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and bacteremia [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%