2001
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8667(2001)013<0056:teodot>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Depuration on Transmission ofAeromonas salmonicidabetween the Freshwater BivalveAmblema plicataand Arctic Char

Abstract: A model system was used to study bacterial fish pathogen transmission between the freshwater bivalve Amblema plicata and two strains (Nauyuk and Lab-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study showed that depuration for seven days eliminated the bacterial infection from the gill tissues of the freshwater bivalves. This finding is in line with a previous study that reported that the depuration effect on Aeromonas salmonicida transmission between the freshwater bivalves (Starliper, 2001). A further study by Othman et al (2015) demonstrated the biological control of streptococcal infection in filter-feeding bivalve mussel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The current study showed that depuration for seven days eliminated the bacterial infection from the gill tissues of the freshwater bivalves. This finding is in line with a previous study that reported that the depuration effect on Aeromonas salmonicida transmission between the freshwater bivalves (Starliper, 2001). A further study by Othman et al (2015) demonstrated the biological control of streptococcal infection in filter-feeding bivalve mussel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…S. liquefaciens were isolated from brook trout with signs of septicaemia in the USA in 1999. The fish was characterized by anus redness, multiple haemorrhages in internal organs, and accumulation of ascitic fluid (Starliper, 2001). During our studies, no symptoms of diseases were detected in salmonids infected with these microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Initial methods were developed to assess microbial concentration in body fluids and whole-body tissues of mussels (Starliper et al 1998;Starliper 2009) and to investigate transmission of bacteria between mussels and fish (Starliper 2001(Starliper , 2005(Starliper , 2008(Starliper , 2009Starliper and Morrison 2000). These studies demonstrated that wild mussels could harbor and potentially transmit fish pathogens (Starliper 2008;Starliper et al 2008), and they established a quarantine period for mussels to depurate bacteria and reduce or eliminate the risk of pathogen transfer (Starliper 2001(Starliper , 2005(Starliper , 2009Starliper and Morrison 2000). This research also provided baseline information on the microbiota of wild, apparently healthy mussels in the Clinch and Holston Rivers, which experienced previous die-off events (Starliper et al 1998(Starliper et al , 2008.…”
Section: Research On the Microbiota Of Freshwater Mollusksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirmation that a bacterium is the causative agent of a disease requires a modified version of Koch's postulates: isolation of the bacterium from the sick or affected mussel, growth in culture, and transmission to and disease production in a healthy host. Transmission studies conducted at the U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Fish Health Branch provided guidelines for evaluating infectivity of bacterial agents (Starliper and Morrison 2000;Starliper 2001Starliper , 2009. Concomitant to transmission studies, the relationship between bacterial concentration and pathology need to be examined.…”
Section: Determine the Prevalence Of Infectious Disease In Mussels Imentioning
confidence: 99%