2019
DOI: 10.1111/scd.12380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of dentist experience on the treatment of individuals with disability under general anesthesia

Abstract: Aims The aim of the present work was to assess in patients with severe disability operated under general anesthesia whether the progressive acquisition of experience by the dental team affects the type of procedure performed and the duration of operations. Methods and results A study group of 911 patients who underwent dental treatment under general anesthesia between 1997 and 2014 was conformed. Information was collected from every patient including: dental diagnosis, dental procedures and duration of the ope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average number of teeth treated per DGA was high for extraction, followed by restorative treatment including SSC and composite in comparison to other procedures. This is in agreement with Fernández-Feijoo et al (2019) , dental extractions were performed as the most common procedure in a different age distributions. Pei-Ying Lee et al, studied dental treatment under GA in healthy and disabled patients between the ages of 1–18 years old, teeth extractions were significantly higher in disabled patients with a lower number of restoration treatments when compared to healthy patients of the same age group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The average number of teeth treated per DGA was high for extraction, followed by restorative treatment including SSC and composite in comparison to other procedures. This is in agreement with Fernández-Feijoo et al (2019) , dental extractions were performed as the most common procedure in a different age distributions. Pei-Ying Lee et al, studied dental treatment under GA in healthy and disabled patients between the ages of 1–18 years old, teeth extractions were significantly higher in disabled patients with a lower number of restoration treatments when compared to healthy patients of the same age group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The existing evidence demonstrates that non-surgical multiple extractions are the most common procedures performed on PSN subjected to GA [ 25 , 26 ], which is supported by the findings of this study, in which 86% of the patients had at least one extraction completed. Multiple dental restorations were performed almost equally frequently by both groups of care providers, with the number of fillings being between one and four.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An important factor is attributed to a greater likelihood of post-GA monitoring of PSN in the private sector, allowing follow-ups and subsequent treatment for common dental problems. Some authors suggest that these patients require 2–6 months of follow-ups after GA to maintain their oral health and to avoid further dental interventions [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Based on our results, we believe that the adequacy of follow-up arrangement for PSN, depending on their needs, is currently a challenge for care providers, leading to the re-admission of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%