2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of dental pulp-capping materials on hard-tissue barrier formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calcium silicate based cement (MTA, Biodentin and iRoot) showed good pulp-capping properties (biocompatibility, inductive effect and tissue response), and no material was superior to the other. They all seemed to form good quality dentinal bridges with minimal inflammation [19][20][21]. Recent evidence suggests that immediate adhesive restoration after the use of silicate materials such as MTA produces acceptable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calcium silicate based cement (MTA, Biodentin and iRoot) showed good pulp-capping properties (biocompatibility, inductive effect and tissue response), and no material was superior to the other. They all seemed to form good quality dentinal bridges with minimal inflammation [19][20][21]. Recent evidence suggests that immediate adhesive restoration after the use of silicate materials such as MTA produces acceptable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic bioceramics were developed in recent years to offset the drawbacks of naturally sourced materials such as MTA [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Biodentine is composed of tricalcium silicate, calcium carbonate and zirconium oxide.…”
Section: Antimicrobialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, available literature tends to assess the differences between recently introduced silicate-based materials like Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maurdes-Fosses, France) with the established mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or even traditional coronal barriers like calcium hydroxide (CH) [26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcium hydroxide has been a gold standard for a long time, but its drawbacks such as lack of adhesion to dentin or other filling materials, lack of proper sealing, and the presence of micro-porosity leading to the formation of tunnel defects that favored bacterial infiltration at the pulp level [1], have led to the production of more intricate materials. It has been recently demonstrated that mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) has a superior effect on hard-tissue barrier formation when compared with calcium hydroxide [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%