1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00039581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of density and mutual interference by a Predator: A laboratory study of predation by the Nudibranch Coryphella rufibranchialis on the hydroid Tubularia larynx

Abstract: The nudibranch Coryphella rufibranchialis (JOHNSTON) feeds on a variety of hydroids, including Tubularia larynx ELLIS & SOLANDF.R. Experiments in which density of prey and predators were altered showed that more prey were eaten as prey density increased. However, more prey were consumed at low predator densities, presumably because of mutual interference among nudibranchs at the higher predator densities. The number of prey consumed per nudibranch was maximal with low predator densities and a ratio of 25--50 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= 18) . density of predators is important, as mutual interference among predators may determine prey mortality(Has- sell, 1966 ;Wharton & Arlian, 1972 ;MacLeod & Valiela, 1975) .In general, the present results on dietary range are in broad agreement with the findings of other studies based on leeches from other geographical regions and/or…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…= 18) . density of predators is important, as mutual interference among predators may determine prey mortality(Has- sell, 1966 ;Wharton & Arlian, 1972 ;MacLeod & Valiela, 1975) .In general, the present results on dietary range are in broad agreement with the findings of other studies based on leeches from other geographical regions and/or…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results of this study suggest differences in the magnitude of the functional response resulting from predator density, such that prey mortality and predator foraging rates may be reduced within prey patches where predators aggregate. Other studies have shown that interference between predators is important to the outcome of interactions between predators and prey, and determines predator dispersion and prey persistence (Beddington 1975, MacLeod & Valiela 1975, Sih 1981, Eveleigh & Chant 1982, Ens & Goss-Custard 1984, Palumbi & Freed 1988. This study further indicates that predator density and interference may be impor-tant in the population dynamics of marine species, by affecting foraging rates and perhaps promoting cannibalism when alternative food resources are limited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Both models fit the data well: there was an inverse relationship between feeding rate and predator density, indicating strong interference among these cannibalistic predators (Crowley & Martin 1989). MacLeod & Valiela (1975) found a similar trend of decreasing prey consumption with increasing predator density for nudibranch predators. At the highest predator density, nudibranchs spent more time in small inactive groups rather than actively searching for prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This study has shown that, at the community level, hydrolds are capable of assimilating very large amounts of organic carbon. This source of carbon is exploited by small predators (McLeod & Valiela 1975) allowing transfer to higher trophic levels. The role of hydroids in coastal food webs be much may greater than previously believed.…”
Section: Digestion Timementioning
confidence: 99%