2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation on women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) in IVF cycle: Evidence from a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2017 systematic review (AMSTAR score = 9, N = 1208) showed DHEA might lead to a slightly higher pregnancy rate in patients with DOR (OR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.99), but have no significant influence on the number of retrieved oocytes, cycle cancellation rate and the miscarriage rate . A systematic review published by Ji et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2017 systematic review (AMSTAR score = 9, N = 1208) showed DHEA might lead to a slightly higher pregnancy rate in patients with DOR (OR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.99), but have no significant influence on the number of retrieved oocytes, cycle cancellation rate and the miscarriage rate . A systematic review published by Ji et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis indicated the clinical pregnancy rate was statistically increased in DOR patients who were pre-treated with DHEA, there was no significant improvement on the number of oocytes retrieved and the cancellation rate, and there was a non-significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate when data were restricted to RCTs [32]. DHEA is diverted from DHEAs in GCs after removing the sulfate by steroid sulfatase [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, DHEA has been suggested to increase fertilization rates and embryo quality ( 27 , 32 , 35 , 36 ). Equally, other investigations including meta-analyses ( 15 , 37 39 ) have demonstrated no clear benefit in terms of oocytes collected, embryo quality, or clinical pregnancy and live birth rates ( 30 , 40 – 43 ). Thus, the use of these adjuvant therapies in IVF remains highly controversial and inconclusive ( 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%