2021
DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2020-0079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of data aggregation on dispersion estimates in count data models

Abstract: For the modelling of count data, aggregation of the raw data over certain subgroups or predictor configurations is common practice. This is, for instance, the case for count data biomarkers of radiation exposure. Under the Poisson law, count data can be aggregated without loss of information on the Poisson parameter, which remains true if the Poisson assumption is relaxed towards quasi-Poisson. However, in biodosimetry in particular, but also beyond, the question of how the dispersion estimates for quasi-Poiss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the scenario in the current paper, where we have weekly counts, an equivalent analysis suggested using and , hence indicating a slightly larger heterogeneity across countries in terms of their death rates. This result is somewhat plausible given other indications in the literature that data aggregation (in this case, from daily to weekly counts), can increase dispersion [ 26 ]. It is important to emphasise that the entire methodology described so far is fully cross-sectional.…”
Section: Methododoloysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For the scenario in the current paper, where we have weekly counts, an equivalent analysis suggested using and , hence indicating a slightly larger heterogeneity across countries in terms of their death rates. This result is somewhat plausible given other indications in the literature that data aggregation (in this case, from daily to weekly counts), can increase dispersion [ 26 ]. It is important to emphasise that the entire methodology described so far is fully cross-sectional.…”
Section: Methododoloysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Poisson (Kato et al 2006;Rübe et al 2008;Martin et al 2013) or quasi-Poisson models (Errington et al 2021). In our case, none of the tested distributions gave us satisfactory results, for this reason we did not assume any distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We conducted an ecological time series study. Time series analysis was conducted using generalised linear models with negative binomial (type II) regression, to take account of overdispersion of the data, 21 while allowing model comparison using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The method was adapted from that described by Tadano et al 22 Mean daily relative humidity, wind speed, temperature and season (calendar day) were controlled for using a smooth function in the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%