1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1977.tb01431.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cutting frequency and applied nitrogen on production and digestibility of perennial ryegrass

Abstract: Grass swards were cut at intervals of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 weeks and received 336 or 673 kg ha "' nitrogen the higher level being applied as a single or as split dressings. Reducing cutting interval from 8 to 2 weeks reduced mean DM yield by 37X from 14 2 to90 t ha"'anddigestible DM yield by 24% from 9 4 to 7 2 t ha"'. The response to the extra N at the highest level of application was greatest under the most frequent cutting regimes. Application of N did not affect the digestibility of DM. Results are discusse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to examining the effect of housing at night on cow performance on a daily basis, the effect of treatment on the overall output of the farm must be considered. For example, infrequent harvesting of herbage for silage may result in higher total herbage yields (Chestnutt et al. , 1977) compared to the frequent harvesting intervals which exist under grazing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to examining the effect of housing at night on cow performance on a daily basis, the effect of treatment on the overall output of the farm must be considered. For example, infrequent harvesting of herbage for silage may result in higher total herbage yields (Chestnutt et al. , 1977) compared to the frequent harvesting intervals which exist under grazing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, shorter grazing rotations were adopted during May and June (treatment AR), as the expected reduction in growth rate of grass herbage from a reduction in defoliation interval (Chestnutt et al. , 1977; Parsons and Penning, 1988; Binnie et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively the regrowth interval between grazing events may be varied to control herbage growth. Although in cut plots annual production of herbage is reduced when defoliation intervals are shortened (Chestnutt et al. , 1977; Parsons and Penning, 1988; Binnie et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed quality of grass for grazing ruminants can be easily manipulated by increasing the leaf proportion through grazing management (Wilkins, 2002). Additionally, DM yields and sward quality can be increased through means of fertilizer application (Chestnutt et al, 2006), resulting in an abundant feedstuff. The IPCC (1997) has estimated that an average grazing beef animal in Western Europe produces 48 kg of CH 4 annually when fed a predominantly forage-based diet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%