2015
DOI: 10.1037/a0037834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of coworker knowledge sharing on performance and its boundary conditions: An interactional perspective.

Abstract: Considering the importance of coworkers and knowledge sharing in current business environment, this study intends to advance understanding by investigating the effect of coworker knowledge sharing on focal employees' task performance. Furthermore, by taking an interactional perspective, this study examines the boundary conditions of coworker knowledge sharing on task performance. Data from 149 samples indicate that there is a positive relationship between coworker knowledge sharing and task performance, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the seven‐item scale that Srivastava et al () produced by combining Faraj and Sproull's () four‐item knowledge sharing scale and Durham ()'s three‐item information sharing scale. Srivastava et al () have validated the combined seven‐item scale, and subsequent research (e.g., Kim, Kim, & Yun, ; Kim & Yun, ) has used the Srivastava et al () seven‐item scale to measure knowledge sharing. The items were “This employee shares his/her special knowledge and expertise with other employees,” “If this employee has some special knowledge about how to perform the task, he/she is likely to tell others about it,” “This employee exchanges information, knowledge, and sharing of skills with other employees,” “This employee freely provides others with hard‐to‐find knowledge or specialized skills,” “This employee helps others in developing relevant strategies,” “This employee shares a lot of information with other employees,” and “This employee offers lots of suggestions to other employees.” A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the seven items from the two scales indicated an acceptable level of fit for a one‐factor model ( χ 2 (12) = 31.47, p < .01; GFI = .95, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the seven‐item scale that Srivastava et al () produced by combining Faraj and Sproull's () four‐item knowledge sharing scale and Durham ()'s three‐item information sharing scale. Srivastava et al () have validated the combined seven‐item scale, and subsequent research (e.g., Kim, Kim, & Yun, ; Kim & Yun, ) has used the Srivastava et al () seven‐item scale to measure knowledge sharing. The items were “This employee shares his/her special knowledge and expertise with other employees,” “If this employee has some special knowledge about how to perform the task, he/she is likely to tell others about it,” “This employee exchanges information, knowledge, and sharing of skills with other employees,” “This employee freely provides others with hard‐to‐find knowledge or specialized skills,” “This employee helps others in developing relevant strategies,” “This employee shares a lot of information with other employees,” and “This employee offers lots of suggestions to other employees.” A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the seven items from the two scales indicated an acceptable level of fit for a one‐factor model ( χ 2 (12) = 31.47, p < .01; GFI = .95, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although trust in coworkers could be a helpful factor in promoting employees' positive attitudes and behaviors (Ferres et al, ; Halbesleben & Wheeler, ), the degree of impact varies between individuals. Prior studies have explored leader factors, employee characteristics, and demographics as moderators in the relationship between coworker influence and outcomes (Kim & Yun, ; Ng and Sorensen, ). For example, Ng and Sorensen () have investigated gender, tenure, and job type as moderating factors in the relationship between coworker support and job satisfaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ng and Sorensen () have investigated gender, tenure, and job type as moderating factors in the relationship between coworker support and job satisfaction. Kim and Yun () have found the moderating roles of abusive supervision and self‐efficacy in the relationship between coworker knowledge sharing and task performance. This research argues that the effects of trust in coworkers are likely stronger for low performers in terms of influencing turnover intention and knowledge‐sharing behavior for the following reasons.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of scholars have proposed that knowledge sharing has a positive influence on a wide range of work outcomes such as employee creativity (Dong et al. ), employee job performance (Kim and Yun ), team creativity (Men et al. ) and firm innovative capability (Podrug, Filipović and Kovač ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%