2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.21.20216945
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of COVID-19 on critical care research during the first year of the pandemic: A prospective longitudinal multinational survey

Abstract: Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the need for high-quality evidence in critical care, while also increasing the barriers to conducting the research needed to produce such evidence. Objective: To determine the effect of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care clinical research. Design: Monthly electronic survey (March - August 2020). Setting: Adult or pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) from any country participating in at least one research study before the COVID-19 pande… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this report, we documented our approaches to address extenuating circumstances and patient retention for a complex At the start of the pandemic, researchers expressed many concerns about the conduct of non-COVID-19 clinical trials. Members of our group collaboratively developed guidelines for continuing or restarting nonpandemic focused research [6] as many clinical trials were interrupted or halted by the pandemic [7]. A myriad of challenges from these interruptions have included lost treatment opportunities for patients [8,9], threatened trial equipment supply chains [9], missed medication doses in vulnerable populations [10], uncertainties about re-starting trials [11], and challenges with data integrity and interpretability due to intercurrent complications (e.g., unavailable study drug, treatment discontinuation due to COVID-19 illness, and missing data) [12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this report, we documented our approaches to address extenuating circumstances and patient retention for a complex At the start of the pandemic, researchers expressed many concerns about the conduct of non-COVID-19 clinical trials. Members of our group collaboratively developed guidelines for continuing or restarting nonpandemic focused research [6] as many clinical trials were interrupted or halted by the pandemic [7]. A myriad of challenges from these interruptions have included lost treatment opportunities for patients [8,9], threatened trial equipment supply chains [9], missed medication doses in vulnerable populations [10], uncertainties about re-starting trials [11], and challenges with data integrity and interpretability due to intercurrent complications (e.g., unavailable study drug, treatment discontinuation due to COVID-19 illness, and missing data) [12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada. 7 Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 8 Department of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like many trials, the global COVID-19 pandemic imposed extenuating circumstances on CYCLE, and ICUs worldwide prioritised COVID-19-related research and clinical care for critically ill patients with COVID-19. 79 80 After 17 March 2020, we paused recruitment in all recruiting centres due to institutional directives prohibiting non-COVID clinical research. Our first site resumed recruitment in June 2020.…”
Section: Data Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had planned to speak to parents with direct experience of involvement in research studies, but the research suspension imposed in response to directives to prioritise COVID-related research made this challenging. 100 We spoke to parents of four children (aged 1 month to 16 years) who had experienced one or more PICU admission(s) at BCH and Kings College London. One parent had experience of their child being recruited to a number of non-PICU research studies.…”
Section: Patient and Public Involvement And Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%