2021
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels

Abstract: Study Question Does the administration of the acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine have an association with ovarian reserve as expressed by circulating anti Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels? Summary Answer Ovarian reserve as assessed by serum AMH levels is not altered at three months following mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. What Is Known Already … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, a recent prospective study also demonstrated that ovarian reserve as assessed by circulating anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations did not change significantly before and three months after two mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations (5.30±4.29 vs 5.30 ±4.50 μg/L; P = 0.11). 21 Furthermore, no association was observed between anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and AMH levels after controlling for age, suggesting that the potential negative effect of immune response following vaccination on fertility may be limited. Similar concern was raised when human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was introduced, especially as it was recommended for adolescents and young women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Consistently, a recent prospective study also demonstrated that ovarian reserve as assessed by circulating anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations did not change significantly before and three months after two mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations (5.30±4.29 vs 5.30 ±4.50 μg/L; P = 0.11). 21 Furthermore, no association was observed between anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and AMH levels after controlling for age, suggesting that the potential negative effect of immune response following vaccination on fertility may be limited. Similar concern was raised when human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was introduced, especially as it was recommended for adolescents and young women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[12] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] .…”
Section: Uncited Referencesunclassified
“…By May 18, 2022, 39,839 individuals had made such reports to the Yellow Card surveillance scheme (1). It is important to note that most people who report such a change following vaccination find that their period rapidly returns to normal (2) and extensive investigation has found no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination adversely impacts female fertility (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Nonetheless, people are concerned by these reports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%