1996
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112096001395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of counterflow on the development of compressible shear layers

Abstract: A compressible countercurrent shear layer was investigated experimentally by establishing reverse flow around the perimeter of a supersonic jet. Measurements demonstrate that spatial growth rates of the countercurrent shear layer significantly exceed those of the classical coflowing layer at comparable density ratios and levels of compressibility. Experiments also reveal the presence of coherent three-dimensional structures in the countercurrent shear layer at convective Mach numbers where similar structures a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can, however, determine immediately a number of interesting things by inspection of Eq. (17). It shows that late in time, when l(t) is much larger than the length scales imposed by the initial conditions, the term on the right becomes small and the layer grows linearly at ð2=3Þ ffiffiffiffi ffi c 0 l p ðc 2 À c 1 Þ Á DV, determined only by the model coefficients and the available shear velocity difference.…”
Section: B Turbulence Quantities and Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can, however, determine immediately a number of interesting things by inspection of Eq. (17). It shows that late in time, when l(t) is much larger than the length scales imposed by the initial conditions, the term on the right becomes small and the layer grows linearly at ð2=3Þ ffiffiffiffi ffi c 0 l p ðc 2 À c 1 Þ Á DV, determined only by the model coefficients and the available shear velocity difference.…”
Section: B Turbulence Quantities and Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Experiments using counterpropagating supersonic jets have suggested that these effects may be in some fashion different for the counterpropagating geometry compared to the co-flowing case. 17 Others have suggested that in the counterflowing case the growth rate can be enhanced by exciting bulk modes of the entire shear layer which are inaccessible to the coflowing case. 18 While this experiment is likely too integrated with other processes, from shocks, high-energydensity plasma effects, etc., to clearly distinguish subtleties of the coflowing versus counterflowing geometries, some of the considerations discovered in previous experiments may ultimately apply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global analysis based on linear absolute instability concepts successfully predicts the occurrence of finite amplitude Global modes in counter-flow mixing layers (Strykowski & Niccum 1991, Strykowski et al 1996, wakes with or without suction (Hammond & Redekopp 1997, Leu & Ho 2000, Oertel 1990, Woodley & Peake 1997, hot or helium jets (Kyle & Sreenivasan 1993, Sreenivasan et al 1989, Yu & Monkewitz 1993, separated boundary layer flows over a double-bump topography (Marquillie & Ehrenstein 2003; see Figure 1), or even flickering candles (Maxworthy 1999), among many other examples.…”
Section: Global Linear Stability Analysis Of Weakly Nonparallel Flowsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presence of a recirculation zone behind ramps has been noticed in several previous studies (Koike et al 2006), but its ability to act as a wavemaker by supporting self-sustained motion has not been previously studied. Counterflow leads to a significant increase in the spatial growth rate of supersonic jets according to the experiments of Strykowski, Krothapalli & Jendoubi (1996). The increased mixing layer growth rate causes a reduction of the potential core length by a factor of two in counterflowing jets at Mach 2, thus a significant mixing enhancement (Gutmark, Schadow & Yu 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%