1998
DOI: 10.1255/ejms.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of counter ions in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization of poly(methyl methacrylate)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reducing the size of the anionic salt component reduces in the present case the cation attachment. Similar findings have been noted for the cationization of polymers [41]. This counter ion effect correlates roughly with the lattice energies of the salt crystals [30].…”
Section: Counter Ion Effectssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Reducing the size of the anionic salt component reduces in the present case the cation attachment. Similar findings have been noted for the cationization of polymers [41]. This counter ion effect correlates roughly with the lattice energies of the salt crystals [30].…”
Section: Counter Ion Effectssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The preference for Li þ attachment to matrix and analyte was also found for other porphyrin matrices. Hoberg et al (1998) showed that, when an alkali-metal cationization strategy is pursued with alkalihalide salts, a halide counter anion should be chosen that results in the lowest lattice energy of the alkalihalide salt. For example, when cationization with sodium is pursued, more abundant sodiated signals for the analyte are observed when sodium iodide is used as the cationizing agent compared to sodium chloride.…”
Section: A Protonation Versus Cationizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEG ions resulting from these distributions should be expected to have the same ionization efficiency and would logically be detected in similar abundance. However, in practice it is difficult to obtain such a result due to the influence of various factors such as matrix concentration, [19 -21] sample morphology, [22] crystallite size, [23] buffer type, [24,25] laser energy, [26] delayed extraction, [27] cation choice, [28,29], and laser fluence [30 -32]. Figure 1 contains MALDI-FTMS spectra obtained for an equimolar mixture of PEG 2K, 4K, 6K, and 8K as a function of relative amount of DHB matrix added.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%