Extensive research into quality of care in different countries yields no conclusive findings that one system is better or worse than others. Quality does not necessarily vary with financing mechanisms; even countries with single-payer systems have variations in quality. Quality is not directly related to the amount spent on health care, since the highest-spending country (the United States) does not have measurably better outcomes. Investments in the quality measurement and reporting systems in all countries would substantially increase the opportunities to learn from cross-national comparisons.L a s t y e a r m y c o lle ag u e s and I reported that U.S. adults receive about half of needed medical care for the leading causes of death and disability. 1 We were asked whether other countries do better than the United States. The paper by Peter Hussey and colleagues suggests that the answer is "no." 2 No country was the top or bottom performer in the twenty-one areas for which comparative data were available. Although this latest study is not comprehensive, we can safely conclude that there is no exemplary health system. So, can these results help policymakers improve quality?
It's Not The FinancingThe quality problem is not caused by the way health care is financed. All of the countries included in the study, except the United States, have some form of national health insurance. Access does not ensure quality. This conclusion is consistent with previous findings. There is no evidence that clinical quality in the United States is consistently better or worse in fee-for-service than in health maintenance organizations (HMOs).3 The appropriateness of many surgical procedures is similar in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, although the rates at which the procedures are used are quite different. 4 Although focused mechanisms that align financial incentives with improved quality performance may contribute to better quality, policymakers should stipulate that universal coverage will not solve the quality problem.
It's How You Spend, Not How Much You SpendHussey and colleagues demonstrate that the amount spent on health care is not related to quality. Health care as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) varies from 7.6 percent in the United Kingdom to 13.9 percent in the United States. 5 The United Kingdom and New Zealand (8.2 percent of GDP spent on health care) had the lowest rates of performance on the greatest number of indicators (eight of nineteen areas). However, the United Kingdom and Australia had the best performance in six areas. The United States, with the highest rate of GDP spending, had the worst performance in two areas and the best perfor-P e r s p e c t i v e 1 0 0 M a y / J u n e 2 0 0 4