1993
DOI: 10.1080/07408179308964296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Correlated Arrivals on Queues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the autocorrelation of demand has never been researched. As Livny et al (1993) and Patuwo et al (1993) claim, it is an important factor a ecting the performance of queuing systems. Most queuing models assume independent customer arrivals, however, those models are often poor representations of real-life systems where correlations do, in fact, abound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the autocorrelation of demand has never been researched. As Livny et al (1993) and Patuwo et al (1993) claim, it is an important factor a ecting the performance of queuing systems. Most queuing models assume independent customer arrivals, however, those models are often poor representations of real-life systems where correlations do, in fact, abound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A little introspection on the nature of burstiness in arrival processes should convince the reader of its deleterious effect on waiting times: Multiple customers arriving in a burst will obviously suffer from increased waiting times, while the lulls separating bursts waste server utilization. Indeed, various studies [5,24,29] have shown that when autocorrelated traffic is offered to a queueing system, the resulting performance measures are much worse than those corresponding to renewal traffic, differing by orders of magnitude. A growing realization of the impact of bursty traffic on queueing system performance has provided the initial motivation for devising input analysis methods that are able to capture dependence in time series; no doubt, this realization is bound to extend to other modeling domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, a little introspection on the nature of burstiness in arrival processes should convince the reader of its deleterious effect on waiting times: many customers arriving in a burst will obviously suffer from increased waiting times, while the lulls separating bursts waste server utilization. Indeed, various studies (see Fendick et al 1989, Livny et al 1993, Patuwo et al 1993) have shown that when autocorrelated traffic is introduced into a queueing system, the resulting performance metrics exhibit significant degradation relative to those estimated by renewal models, often differing by orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%