1998
DOI: 10.1177/109467059800100107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Corporate Image in the Formation of Customer Loyalty

Abstract: Based on theory from consumer behavior; cognitive psychology, and social cognitive psychology, this article explores the effect of corporate image in the formation of customer loyalty. Findings from the goods and service sector indicate that corporate image has a significant but indirect impact on customer loyalty. In conclusion, the authors claim that customer loyalty is driven both by disconfirmation of expectations and corporate image.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
188
2
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
188
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…(2000) report that corporate image is a main driver of customer satisfaction and loyalty in retail banking. Andreassen and Lindestad (1998) do not support the hypothesized direct impact of corporate image (interpreted synonymously to reputation) on loyalty, and also the study results discussed by Bloemer and de Ruyter (1998) initially do not support the hypothesized direct impact of corporate image on bank customers ' satisfaction and loyalty but show that this effect is mediated by perceived quality. The authors also point out that -as an input for customer evaluations -image perceptions should precede satisfaction and loyalty.…”
Section: The Loyalty Of Individual Investorscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…(2000) report that corporate image is a main driver of customer satisfaction and loyalty in retail banking. Andreassen and Lindestad (1998) do not support the hypothesized direct impact of corporate image (interpreted synonymously to reputation) on loyalty, and also the study results discussed by Bloemer and de Ruyter (1998) initially do not support the hypothesized direct impact of corporate image on bank customers ' satisfaction and loyalty but show that this effect is mediated by perceived quality. The authors also point out that -as an input for customer evaluations -image perceptions should precede satisfaction and loyalty.…”
Section: The Loyalty Of Individual Investorscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…He describes voice (in contrast to exit) an option for customers receiving poor quality of service toexert pressure on public service providers to improve their performance. Andreassen and Lindestad (1998) state that people might be loyal to a company for three reasons: high switching barriers, lack of alternatives or customer satisfaction. In Hirschman's model loyalty is ambiguous.…”
Section: Theory Of Exit Voice and Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1989 the Swedish Customer Satisfaction Barometer (SCSB), was developed for assessing the service of domestically purchased and consumed products and services (Fornell, 1992); 1994 saw the advent of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) (Fornell et al 1996), while two years later, in 1996 the Norwegian Customer Satisfaction Barometer, the NCSB, was created: (Andreassen, Lindestad 1998); in 2000 the European Customer Satisfaction Index, the ECSI, was developed (Eklof 2000).…”
Section: Measuring Customer Satisfaction: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%