2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61848-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in rural Bangladesh: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
165
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
165
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The demographic characteristics were not significantly different among the six groups ( Table 1). The cord separation time was significantly shorter in the dry care group (7 [6-7] days) compared to other groups (p < 0.001).In the post-hoc analysis, the cord separation time in both 4% chlorhexidine groups (group 3: 10 [7][8][9][10][11][12] days; group 6: 10 [8-12] days) was significantly longer than that in groups 1, 2, and 5 (p < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference when compared with the povidone-iodine group. The cord separation time was found to be 7 (6-10) days, 8 (6-11) days, and 7 (6-10) days in groups 2, 4, and 5, respectively, without any statistical differences (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The demographic characteristics were not significantly different among the six groups ( Table 1). The cord separation time was significantly shorter in the dry care group (7 [6-7] days) compared to other groups (p < 0.001).In the post-hoc analysis, the cord separation time in both 4% chlorhexidine groups (group 3: 10 [7][8][9][10][11][12] days; group 6: 10 [8-12] days) was significantly longer than that in groups 1, 2, and 5 (p < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference when compared with the povidone-iodine group. The cord separation time was found to be 7 (6-10) days, 8 (6-11) days, and 7 (6-10) days in groups 2, 4, and 5, respectively, without any statistical differences (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cochrane review by Zupan et al 6 reported studies mainly conducted in hospitals in high-income countries; the results cannot be generalized to community settings in low-income countries, where achieving clean and dry cord care is difficult [7][8][9][10]. A recent meta-analysis that included studies from both developing and developed countries reported that 4% chlorhexidine significantly reduced omphalitis in community settings 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low rate compares favorably to chlorhexidine application trials conducted in south Asia (5% lost to follow-up in Bangladesh, and 2.5% lost to follow-up in Nepal) and newborn health trials in Africa. 7,8,22,23 Structural barriers. In Zambia, like many African countries, rural communities are widely dispersed, and families often travel great distances to reach primary health centers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of 4% chlorhexidine as a topical umbilical antiseptic has been recently shown to reduce omphalitis and all-cause neonatal mortality in southern Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. [5][6][7][8] The choice of 4% chlorhexidine was based on the safety of this concentration and its efficacy in reducing cord colonization. 9,10 At the time of our study initiation in 2010, only one of these studies (Nepal) had been completed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Although the scope and methodologies of these reviews differed, all 4 stratified results according to the study setting, distinguishing results reported from communities with high proportions of births at home and high neonatal mortality rates from those obtained in hospitals and settings with low neonatal mortality rates. These analyses concluded that 3 studies (including >44 000 subjects) in community settings in South Asia with a high neonatal mortality rate 3,25,26 24 No other cord-management strategies have been evaluated systematically in such settings, but the application of traditional materials (eg, ash, herbal or other vegetal poultices, and human milk) may provide a source of contamination with pathogenic bacteria, including C tetani. 27 In contrast, the meta-analyses found little evidence of benefit from topical treatments for infants born in hospitals.…”
Section: Evidence-based Practicementioning
confidence: 99%