2013
DOI: 10.1080/16823206.2013.847010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cooperative learning on the thinking skills development of Foundation Phase learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design and implementation of the intervention were underpinned by the pillars of Cognitive Education, namely teaching FOR, OF, and ABOUT thinking (see Table 1 ). The heart of the intervention encompassed the modeling of the following teaching strategies to the in-service teacher participants to develop the thinking skills and dispositions to promote self-regulated action, namely, Thinking Maps ( Hyerle, 2014 ), De Bono’s thinking hats ( Evans and Carolan, 2014 ), Habits of Mind ( Costa, 2009 ; Anderson, 2010 ), cooperative learning ( Booysen and Grosser, 2014 ), the Q-Matrix ( Wiederhold and Kagan, 2007 ), problem-based learning ( Hmelo-Silver, 2004 ), and Bloom’s revised taxonomy ( Kratwohl, 2002 ). The application of all the strategies initially involves a teacher-regulated environment to encourage the development of thinking skills and dispositions to employ during learning that could be beneficial for ensuring the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of conditions associated with the cognitive component of self-regulated learning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design and implementation of the intervention were underpinned by the pillars of Cognitive Education, namely teaching FOR, OF, and ABOUT thinking (see Table 1 ). The heart of the intervention encompassed the modeling of the following teaching strategies to the in-service teacher participants to develop the thinking skills and dispositions to promote self-regulated action, namely, Thinking Maps ( Hyerle, 2014 ), De Bono’s thinking hats ( Evans and Carolan, 2014 ), Habits of Mind ( Costa, 2009 ; Anderson, 2010 ), cooperative learning ( Booysen and Grosser, 2014 ), the Q-Matrix ( Wiederhold and Kagan, 2007 ), problem-based learning ( Hmelo-Silver, 2004 ), and Bloom’s revised taxonomy ( Kratwohl, 2002 ). The application of all the strategies initially involves a teacher-regulated environment to encourage the development of thinking skills and dispositions to employ during learning that could be beneficial for ensuring the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of conditions associated with the cognitive component of self-regulated learning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research which we have carried out derives from the widely proven premise that cooperative learning in any of its three interactive structures (collaboration, cooperation and tutoring) is superior to other classroom management strategies, and especially in the math class (Hossain & Tarmizi, 2013, Ke & Grabowski, 2007, Lehrer & Lesh, 2013, Nunnery, Chappell, & Arnold, 2013, Özsoy & Yildiz, 2004, Roseth, Johnson, & Johnson, 2008, Zakaria, Solfitri, Daud, & Abidin, 2013 for its evident influence on the generation mathematical reasoning (Booisen & Grosser, 2014). In fact, barring few studies which do not reveal differences between cooperation strategies and other types (Tracey, Madden, & Slavin, 2010), most works confirm that the cooperative organization in the math class it is indeed the teaching and learning structure which generates the best results in a highly relevant variable for this particular discipline: academic performance (Winne & Nesbit, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The course is designed based on the principle of Constructive Alignment (CA) [8,9]. Via Constructivist Principles, CA affirms that both the teaching and learning activities as well as the assessment tasks must support the development of the learning outcomes among students.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study attempts to report the use of computational tools (software) to support the implementation of CL activity. CL is a useful teaching methodology for development of different cognitive skills [8,9]. To date, not many utilize computational tools to support AL environment for teaching chemical engineering majors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%