The effect of contextual factors on quality improvement success in a lean-driven New Zealand healthcare environment

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to theorise and test a causal model of predominantly lean-driven quality improvement (QI) in the context of health-care clinical microsystems, examining the effects contextual factors in this setting have on improvement activity. Design/methodology/approach QI practitioners at a New Zealand District Health Board were surveyed on a range of contextual factors hypothesised to influence improvement outcomes. Survey responses were analysed via partial least squares path modelling to test the causal model that was designed to be consistent with the “model for understanding success in quality” (MUSIQ) model (Kaplan et al., 2012) adopted in health-care QI. Findings Defined variables for teamwork, respect for people, lean actions and negative motivating factors all demonstrated significant effects. These findings support the representation of the microsystem layer within the MUSIQ model. The final model predicted and explained perceived success well (adjusted R2 = 0.58). Research limitations/implications The sample was a non-probability sample and the sample size was small (n = 105), although power analysis indicated that we exceeded the minimum sample size (97 cases). Even though health-care processes have universality, this study was conducted in only one district in New Zealand. Practical implications The results support highly functional teamwork as the critical contextual factor in health-care QI outcomes and suggest lean-driven process improvement can be a valid mediating mechanism. The key recommendation for practitioners is to increase focus on human resource capability when initiating and supporting QI. Originality/value The originality is testing the robustness of the MUSIQ model specifically in a lean environment, which provides the context for QI. The paper provides a more detailed specification of contextual factors acting as exogenous variables that moderate the cause (lean actions) and the effect (perceived success).

Perspective Chapter: A Renewed Perspective on Lean Six Sigma in Healthcare – People and Performance

“…LSS as a combination of Lean Management and Six Sigma is seen as the most effective process improvement that it is widely implemented in the top performing organizations [9], also in healthcare settings [2,10]. Although the integration of Lean Management and Six Sigma is still relatively rare in healthcare [11], more and more studies report positive effect of LSS on outcomes. For example, Bhat et al [12] explore the successful deployment of LSS in the Indian healthcare sector and found improvements in patient registration cycle time and reductions in average waiting time, queue length, and staff utilization.…”

Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Lean in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review

“…Becoming a learning organisation is one of the enablers of Lean that allows for a space that promotes problem-solving. Training was identified as an important contributor to the sustainability of Lean in hospitals, as it facilitates the sharing of knowledge and the development of a shared understanding among staff and management [30]. The implementation of Lean should start with training to introduce Lean and communicate the what, where, and how of the implementation process.…”

Using lean techniques and discrete-event simulation for performance improvement in an outpatient clinic

“…As a result, we recommend to use the VSM from the lean analysis as a blueprint for the DES model, as it provides the events in concern and their respective sequences and it helps in narrowing the scope to decide what variabilities should be in concern. Finally and more importantly, successful implementation of lean requires a supportive and cooperative culture from all stakeholders involved in the system as shown in studies such as Ajmera and Jain (2019), Antony (2011), Lima et al (2020 and Wilson et al (2018). As a result, managers would be required to strive to instill a cultural change in their organization highlighting the importance of teamwork, staff engagement and interdepartmental cooperation in the success of lean implementation.…”