2019
DOI: 10.1177/0305735619854534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of concurrent visual feedback on adult singing accuracy

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to test the effect of concurrent visual feedback on adult non-musicians’ growth in pitch accuracy over 10 weeks. University students not majoring in music were randomly assigned to one of two groups and played a computer game, SingingCoach, that provided concurrent visual feedback based on their singing accuracy. The pre-/post-test design with a treatment showed that both groups improved their scores significantly over 10 weeks, but the treatment group, the group that received con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the distraction, feedback on dynamic stability allowed participants to consider it during their learning as evidenced by their improvement at both the Acquisition-NIC and Transfer condition. This effect coincides with previous results using RTVF for pitch accuracy in singing voice melody production where the results of performance tend to decay while using the technology but improve at later post-tests scores (Welch et al, 1989 ; Wilson et al, 2005 ; Paney and Tharp, 2019 ). This suggests that, besides the increase of cognitive load that RTVF may impose on participants by worsening their performance while receiving feedback, it should not be considered a damaging factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, despite the distraction, feedback on dynamic stability allowed participants to consider it during their learning as evidenced by their improvement at both the Acquisition-NIC and Transfer condition. This effect coincides with previous results using RTVF for pitch accuracy in singing voice melody production where the results of performance tend to decay while using the technology but improve at later post-tests scores (Welch et al, 1989 ; Wilson et al, 2005 ; Paney and Tharp, 2019 ). This suggests that, besides the increase of cognitive load that RTVF may impose on participants by worsening their performance while receiving feedback, it should not be considered a damaging factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Participants from the control group also participated in two different conditions, but instead of receiving feedback, they were explicitly asked to focus their attention on a particular modality when performing the required exercise. Previous studies which evaluated the effects of real-time feedback have shown that although a pattern of worsening results appeared at the moment of receiving feedback, it was compensated with higher improvements at the Transfer conditions (Welch et al, 1989 ; Wilson et al, 2005 ; Paney and Tharp, 2019 ). The reasons attributed to these events are usually related to an increase in cognitive load at the time of receiving the feedback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The most robust and reliable improvement was found when participants received augmented visual feedback during training through the commercial software package Erol Singer's Studio. This finding converges with other studies that found similar effects for training of singing accuracy (Hoppe et al, 2006;Paney & Tharp, 2021;Welch et al, 1989;Wilson et al, 2008), and more generally with research in the motor control literature suggesting an advantage for visual feedback in early learning stages for complex tasks (Sigrist et al, 2013). This result is important in both practical and theoretical senses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One possible means of helping inaccurate singers is to provide feedback during imitation to augment their perceptual acuity. While reviews of previous studies have found mixed benefits from auditory feedback (Nichols & Lorah, 2020), research focusing on visual feedback has been more promising (Hoppe et al, 2006; Paney & Tharp, 2021; Welch et al, 1989; Wilson et al, 2008). This may be a result of the theory that in order to sing accurately, an individual must have an internal model of the auditory-vocal system, something not fully developed in all individuals (Pfordresher, Halpern, & Greenspon, 2015; Pfordresher & Mantell, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also found that participants' results tended to worsen at the moment of receiving feedback. Recently, Paney and Tharp ( 2019 ) evaluated the effects of real-time visual feedback with KR after 10 weeks of melody-singing training without finding significant differences with the control group. Some remarkable insights from that study come from the fact that participants using visual feedback tended to obtain better results than the control group although both groups improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%