1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(75)90075-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of concentration of suspension on the filtration rates and pseudofaecal production for Mytilus edulis L., Cerastoderma edule (L.) and Venerupis pullastra (Montagu)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
118
1
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
118
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study show that there is no effect of food cell concentration on the nitration rate of M. edulis up to 20 x 10 3 cells ml" 1 . This independence of cell concentration is similar to that described by Thompson & Bayne (1974) and by Foster-Smith (1975) over a wider range of concentrations (50 x 10 3 to 700 x 10 6 cells I" 1 ). However, Winter (1973) has recorded a decline in the filtration rate of M. edulis with increasing cell concentrations between 10 and 40 x 10 6 cells 1 -1 .…”
Section: F = Food Concentration (Cells /Il~l)supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study show that there is no effect of food cell concentration on the nitration rate of M. edulis up to 20 x 10 3 cells ml" 1 . This independence of cell concentration is similar to that described by Thompson & Bayne (1974) and by Foster-Smith (1975) over a wider range of concentrations (50 x 10 3 to 700 x 10 6 cells I" 1 ). However, Winter (1973) has recorded a decline in the filtration rate of M. edulis with increasing cell concentrations between 10 and 40 x 10 6 cells 1 -1 .…”
Section: F = Food Concentration (Cells /Il~l)supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Firstly, the smaller animals filter proportionately more food than the larger animals. Secondly, although no pseudofaeces were observed at the time of faeces collection from smaller animals, pseudofaeces are known to be produced by M. edulis when fed at cell concentrations above approximately 20000 cells ml" 1 (Thompson & Bayne, 1972;Foster-Smith, 1975), and unpublished observations suggest that this threshold concentration for pseudofaecal production is reduced with declining body size, occurring at a concentration of approximately 8000 cells ml" 1 for a 20 mg animal. Thirdly, assimilation efficiency of animals fed at the high ration levels also declines with decreasing body size (Fig.…”
Section: F = Food Concentration (Cells /Il~l)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1995. A relationship between filtration rate and food concentration has often been demonstrated for Dreissena and many other filter-feeding bivalves, with filtration rates declining exponentially as a function of increasing food concentration when concentrations are above an incipient limiting concentration (Winter 1973, Foster Smith 1975, Walz 1978, Sprung and Rose 1988, Dorgelo and Smeenk 1988, Reeders and bij de Vaate 1990. When food concentrations are below this incipient level, filtration rates were reportedly independent of food concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thompson & Bayne 1974, Epifanio & Edwart 1977, Crisp et al 1985, Deslous-Paoli et al 1992. This is partly due to the saturating nature of the FR as discussed above, but is also a consequence of increasing S resulting only in greater pseudofaeces production (see Foster-Smith 1975, Barillé et al 1997). Therefore we also describe IR as a Type 2 hyperbolic This above function gives us the total S ingested.…”
Section: Treatments Of Oysters and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 93%