2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196399.29893.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Computerized Tailored Brief Advice on At-risk Drinking in Subcritically Injured Trauma Patients

Abstract: The computer-generated intervention was associated with a significant decrease in alcohol use and at-risk drinking. Research is needed to further evaluate and adapt information technology to provide preventive clinical services in the ED.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
162
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
162
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In 11 trials rated as low to moderate risk of bias that used 14 comparisons (37-39, 48-55), e-interventions were associated with a small, statistically significant reduction in alcohol consumption at 6-month follow-up (MD, −11. Drinking Limit Guidelines-In 4 trials that reported proportion of participants meeting drinking limit guidelines at 6 months (40,43,44,57), including 2 trials rated as high risk of bias, e-interventions had no statistically significant effect on meeting guidelines (risk ratio, …”
Section: E-intervention Characteristics and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 11 trials rated as low to moderate risk of bias that used 14 comparisons (37-39, 48-55), e-interventions were associated with a small, statistically significant reduction in alcohol consumption at 6-month follow-up (MD, −11. Drinking Limit Guidelines-In 4 trials that reported proportion of participants meeting drinking limit guidelines at 6 months (40,43,44,57), including 2 trials rated as high risk of bias, e-interventions had no statistically significant effect on meeting guidelines (risk ratio, …”
Section: E-intervention Characteristics and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening was conducted with CASI, which has been cited as effective and user friendly. 7,8 This study is limited in that screening all adult trauma patients was attempted, but only 47% actually received an SBI. Although patient characteristics played a role, the most common reasons for not receiving CASI were patients being missed before discharge in the ED (46%) and being missed before discharge from the inpatient units (26%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In a case-control study, patients who received CASI were significantly less likely to report at-risk drinking behavior compared with patients without an intervention (p ϭ 0.008), and they significantly decreased their alcohol intake (p ϭ 0.006) at 6-month follow-up. 8 A study that surveyed CASI respondents in Spanish and English found that 98% of patients found the system easy to use and 75% preferred CASI over a provider-delivered SBI. 7 The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma mandated in 2006 that all level 1 and level 2 trauma centers develop a protocol for administering SBI.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another ED study found that individuals contemplating changing reported poorer outcomes at 6-month follow-up compared with individuals in the precontemplation or action stages of change (Neumann et al, 2006). Walton et al (2008) did not fi nd any relationship between pretreatment levels of change and intervention outcomes over time (baseline to 12-month follow-up).…”
Section: Abstract Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%