2012
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2012.641490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Computerized Provider Order Entry on Medical Students’ Ability to Write Orders

Abstract: When admission order completeness and quality for medical students who trained at hospitals using CPOE were compared to those who trained using handwritten orders, no important differences were found.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, order sets also increased residents’ comfort level with symptom management in palliative care [ 8 ]. In the undergraduate setting, pneumonia admission order-writing skills among medical students trained at hospitals using computerized provider order-entry (CPOE) compared to those using handwritten orders were no different [ 9 ]. However, the effect of order sets on resident knowledge and order-writing skills has not previously been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, order sets also increased residents’ comfort level with symptom management in palliative care [ 8 ]. In the undergraduate setting, pneumonia admission order-writing skills among medical students trained at hospitals using computerized provider order-entry (CPOE) compared to those using handwritten orders were no different [ 9 ]. However, the effect of order sets on resident knowledge and order-writing skills has not previously been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, students in the CPOE groups reported less occasions to place orders as their supervisors either placed the orders before them or didn’t let them by lack of time. [ 17 , 18 ] In our study design, as the software was already part of the routine workflow in the hospital, CRs were keener on letting students place orders using CPOE. Moreover we used a randomized cross-controlled design to avoid the bias of getting the most motivated students and CRs in the case group as well as a method of analysis taking account of the various uncontrollable factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4 6 ] Although CPOE can facilitate medical prescription and reduce serious medication error rates by more than half [ 7 12 ], few studies have addressed the impact of CPOE on the students’ medical training and ability to place sound orders, despite the indication that it could be useful, particularly through the immediate feedback about the placed order. [ 13 18 ] These trials yielded negative results, yet they provide insights on the possible causes of failure: lack of randomization, of time and investment from the supervisors, focus on a specialty, factors of confusion such as the addition of learning material in both groups, or a method of evaluation which did not capture the beneficial effect of the intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the advent of EHRs, students’ opportunities to work with patient medical records have been influenced by rotations at sites with different EHR platforms, by supervising physicians’ differing levels of comfort with and ability to use EHRs, and by policies that restrict student EHR use. 6,7 A 2009 survey of clerkship directors showed that many students lack full EHR access. To illustrate, only about a fourth of directors (27%) reported that students could use the EHR to view patient records, write notes, and enter orders (which a supervising physician had to cosign); less than half (41%) allowed students to view the EHR and write notes; and a nearly a third (32%) allowed students view-only access.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%