2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[17] AbuSeileek examined the effects of collaborative learning, small group size, and two different instructional modes among undergraduate students who took English as a Foreign Language (EFL). [18] AbuSeileek found that a groups of 5-students showed significantly better performance over groups of 2 to 7 students. [18] In contrast, Morrison argued that it is not uncommon for one or more group members who tend to be on the lazy side, not to contribute when there are more than 4 members in a group and considered that the ideal group size for online is 3 or 4 group members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[17] AbuSeileek examined the effects of collaborative learning, small group size, and two different instructional modes among undergraduate students who took English as a Foreign Language (EFL). [18] AbuSeileek found that a groups of 5-students showed significantly better performance over groups of 2 to 7 students. [18] In contrast, Morrison argued that it is not uncommon for one or more group members who tend to be on the lazy side, not to contribute when there are more than 4 members in a group and considered that the ideal group size for online is 3 or 4 group members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] AbuSeileek found that a groups of 5-students showed significantly better performance over groups of 2 to 7 students. [18] In contrast, Morrison argued that it is not uncommon for one or more group members who tend to be on the lazy side, not to contribute when there are more than 4 members in a group and considered that the ideal group size for online is 3 or 4 group members. [19] As stated earlier, students who wanted to complete the assignments by him/herself, were allowed to do so independently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive impacts of computer-supported collaborative "focus on form" on grammatical accuracy is partially warranted in NNS-NNS and NNS-NS pattern [5,25,28,36,39]. The ECEs generated in NNS-NS interactions were deemed to facilitate authentic language input and interactional modifications regarding morphosyntax, lexicons and pronunciation with a wealth of target-like linguistic and stylistic features [14,21,22,25,31,32].…”
Section: Sotillo (2005) [28]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous meta-analyses have reported that computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), where individuals are encouraged or required in negotiation and sharing of meanings to solve problems at hand in groups or within organizations with the help of modern information and communication technology [1,2], markedly enhanced learning opportunities for non-native speakers [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. These overall advantages of CSCL were variously explained from different theoretical perspectives: computer-supported collaboration functions on the basis of "groupware" providing individuals with a higher level of information sharing, coordinating and navigating; social connectivity was enhanced through equal participation that was facilitated in the CSCL environment; and especially the socially distributed process of inquiry in CSCL has been underscored for building collective intelligence in such a technologically sophisticated collaborative language-learning environment.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation