2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1373879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of compressive loading on the ultrasonic detectability of kissing bonds in adhesive joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to conventional techniques like welding and mechanical fastening, the adhesive bonding offers a number of advantages, such as uniform stress distribution, increased fatigue properties, a seal against liquids or gases, a reduction in structural weight, and connecting dissimilar materials [1]. However, there are several possible sources of weakness in adhesively bonded joints, such as gross flaws (cracks, voids, or porosities), poor cohesion, poor adhesion, and kissing bonds [2] [3] [4]. Therefore, non-destructive testing (NDT) methods are utilized to evaluate bonding integrity of the components unable to be destructively tested or in service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to conventional techniques like welding and mechanical fastening, the adhesive bonding offers a number of advantages, such as uniform stress distribution, increased fatigue properties, a seal against liquids or gases, a reduction in structural weight, and connecting dissimilar materials [1]. However, there are several possible sources of weakness in adhesively bonded joints, such as gross flaws (cracks, voids, or porosities), poor cohesion, poor adhesion, and kissing bonds [2] [3] [4]. Therefore, non-destructive testing (NDT) methods are utilized to evaluate bonding integrity of the components unable to be destructively tested or in service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It hides in localized spots surrounded by more-or-less well-bonded areas and is difficult to detect ultrasonically due to its low contrast in C-scans [5]. Additionally, kissing bonds cause a large reduction of bonding strength and an adhesive failure mode can be observed after it fractures [4] [6]. Thus, the occurrence of kissing bonds is in general not acceptable for aircraft structure because it may lead to fatal catastrophes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A liquid layer defect is achieved by the introduction of a thin layer of a contaminant such as grease at the adhesive/adherend interface. The thickness of the contaminant is much thinner than the thickness of the adhesive layer but has a detrimental effect on the strength of the joint as the level of adhesion is reduced by up to 80% of the original bond shear strength over the contaminated area [11].…”
Section: Adhesive Bondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6]. Most have categorised kissing defects into two types, dry contact and liquid layer [39]. In a dry contact recreation, adhesive is applied to one adherend and cured.…”
Section: Experimentally Simulated Kissing Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%