2019
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cold ambient temperature and preceding active warm-up on lactate kinetics in female cyclists and triathletes

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cold ambient temperature on lactate kinetics with and without a preceding warm-up in female cyclists/triathletes. Seven female cyclists/triathletes participated in this study. The randomized, crossover study included 3 experimental visits that comprised the following conditions: (i) thermoneutral temperature (20 °C; NEU); (ii) cold temperature (0 °C) with no active warm-up (CNWU); and (iii) cold temperature (0 °C) with 25-min active warm-up (CWU). During each… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In C, our data show a 2.3% reduction in WL max , much lower than the 20% decrease found by Quirion et al ( 1989 ) at − 20 °C. Also WL at LT is decreased in C (-3.5%): previous research demonstrated greater WL at LT within the so defined optimal ambient temperature (from − 4 to 0 °C, if properly dressed Morrissey et al 2019 ; Sandsund et al 2012 )) if compared to higher or lower ambient temperatures. On the other hand, others claim no differences in WL at LT or VT between + 20 °C and − 14 °C (Renberg et al 2014 ; Therminarias 1992 ; Therminarias et al 1989 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In C, our data show a 2.3% reduction in WL max , much lower than the 20% decrease found by Quirion et al ( 1989 ) at − 20 °C. Also WL at LT is decreased in C (-3.5%): previous research demonstrated greater WL at LT within the so defined optimal ambient temperature (from − 4 to 0 °C, if properly dressed Morrissey et al 2019 ; Sandsund et al 2012 )) if compared to higher or lower ambient temperatures. On the other hand, others claim no differences in WL at LT or VT between + 20 °C and − 14 °C (Renberg et al 2014 ; Therminarias 1992 ; Therminarias et al 1989 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, Quirion et al (1989 ) found a 22% reduction in maximal WorkLoad (WL) and Oksa et al ( 2004 ) a 9% decrease in running performance time when exposed to − 20 °C if compared to + 20 °C. Concerning WL at Lactate Threshold (LT), the same distinction between moderate (> − 15 °C) and severe (< −15 °C) cold previously mentioned for O 2max should be considered: in fact, Morrissey et al ( 2019 ) found a 22% higher WL and Sandsund et al ( 2012 ) a 10% increase in running speed at LT within − 4 and 1 °C if compared to 20 °C (suggesting this as the optimal ambient temperature range for aerobic endurance performance), whereas Renberg and colleagues (2014) found no differences in PO at − 14 °C if compared to + 20 °C in women. However, no information on mechanical work variation at LT when exposed to severe cold (i.e., −20 °C) is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, no warm-up does not mean absence of warming-up effects during the activities of the main part of the training session (as previously discussed). Counter-intuitively, the warm-up is not always clearly superior to no warm-up in terms of immediate performance enhancement for all assessed variables [ 19 , 49 , 50 ] and, even when the warm-up is superior to no warm-up, the magnitude of the effect of such improvement is sometimes small [ 8 ].…”
Section: How To Implement a Warm-up?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the resting state, the liver and kidneys account for disposal of around 60 and 25-30% of circulating lactate by converting lactate into glucose (Cohen and Woods, 1983). During exercise at higher ambient temperatures, lactate production may be greater (Claremont et al, 1975;Morrissey et al, 2019), but opposite effects have also been reported (Marino et al, 2001).…”
Section: Metabolic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%