2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Cognitive Style Analysis (CSA) test on achievement: A meta-analytic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also consistent with previous literature (Cotti et al, 2016;Aragón et al, 2014;Camps and Luna-Aroca, 2012). In brief, there is substantial literature examining the relationship between various conceptualizations of motivation as mediator in performance (Peterson and Meissel, 2015). The result of fourth mediating variable, interpersonal influence is also in lined with previous researches (Aktan and Chao, 2016;Ogbonnaya and Valizade, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results are also consistent with previous literature (Cotti et al, 2016;Aragón et al, 2014;Camps and Luna-Aroca, 2012). In brief, there is substantial literature examining the relationship between various conceptualizations of motivation as mediator in performance (Peterson and Meissel, 2015). The result of fourth mediating variable, interpersonal influence is also in lined with previous researches (Aktan and Chao, 2016;Ogbonnaya and Valizade, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The intuitive type tends to involve imagination, understanding, metaphor, rhythm, instant reaction, attitudes and emotions. However, the analytical type tends to organize and process information and messages in a detailed manner; at the same time, it is characterized by precise thinking, logical reasoning, structured problem-solving and methodical approach (Allinson and Hayes, 1996; Peterson and Meissel, 2015). The role that cognitive styles play in knowledge creation varies (Peterson and Meissel, 2015).…”
Section: Related Concepts and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge creation is a multidimensional issue that is primarily linked with strategy (Kim et al , 2014), leadership (von Krogh et al , 2012), culture (Chen and Fong, 2015), cognitive behavior (Luse et al , 2013; Aggarwal and Woolley, 2013; Peterson and Meissel, 2015), creation task (Kao et al , 2011; Andersen, 2014; Wu et al , 2015; Uy et al , 2015) and technology (Canzano and Grimaldi, 2012; Zhang et al , 2015) (Table I). Its outcomes are derived from the mutual agitation and conversion of tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995); hence, knowledge creation is influenced by intrinsic traits (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final score is computed as the ratio between the two, indicating in which test, the participant performed better and to what extent. This ratio allows the CSA to be value-free [ 63 ] because it does not report the overall performance. Unfortunately, the CSA displays serious reliability issues [ 62 , 64 , 65 ], perhaps due to the lack of discrimination between the holistic and analytic performances tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%