2020
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1710510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cognitive stimulation on the progression of cognitive impairment in subjects with Alzheimer’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding global cognition, the personalized and adapted program of CS achieved statistical significance between and within group improvements in the ND, SCI, and LD groups, post-intervention, and at months, and 12 months. Other authors found similar results between groups in participants with normal cognition (Polito et al, 2015;Schultheisz et al, 2018) and within group (P. Gamito et al, 2020;Park et al, 2019;Tarnanas et al, 2014); in participants with MCI bet-ween groups (Polito et al, 2015;Tsai et al, 2019), and within group (Llanero Luque et al, 2011), also including older adults from MCI to mild-to-moderate dementia bet-ween groups (J Alves et al, 2014) and within group (Kim et al, 2017) post-intervention; as well as an effect of interaction between session and group in participants with MCI (Moro et al, 2015) In agreement with our results, other authors also found no significant differences in participants with dementia, between groups (Capotosto et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2021;López et al, 2022), all of them administered adapted CS but with a higher number of sessions. Two of them applied participants living in a community and within group (Alvares-Pereira et al, 2021;J Alves et al, 2014;Capotosto et al, 2017;Cove et al, 2014;Gibbor et al, 2021;Justo-Henriques et al, 2021;López et al, 2022;Miranda-Castillo et al, 2013;Orrell et al, 2012;Orgeta et al, 2015), four of these studies applied to in younger aged older adults (J Alves et al, 2014;Cove et al, 2014;Justo-Henriques et al, 2021;Orgeta et al, 2015), and five administered adapted CS (Jorge Alves et al, 2014;Capotosto et al, 2017;Cove et al, 2014;Gibbor et al, 2021;…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding global cognition, the personalized and adapted program of CS achieved statistical significance between and within group improvements in the ND, SCI, and LD groups, post-intervention, and at months, and 12 months. Other authors found similar results between groups in participants with normal cognition (Polito et al, 2015;Schultheisz et al, 2018) and within group (P. Gamito et al, 2020;Park et al, 2019;Tarnanas et al, 2014); in participants with MCI bet-ween groups (Polito et al, 2015;Tsai et al, 2019), and within group (Llanero Luque et al, 2011), also including older adults from MCI to mild-to-moderate dementia bet-ween groups (J Alves et al, 2014) and within group (Kim et al, 2017) post-intervention; as well as an effect of interaction between session and group in participants with MCI (Moro et al, 2015) In agreement with our results, other authors also found no significant differences in participants with dementia, between groups (Capotosto et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2021;López et al, 2022), all of them administered adapted CS but with a higher number of sessions. Two of them applied participants living in a community and within group (Alvares-Pereira et al, 2021;J Alves et al, 2014;Capotosto et al, 2017;Cove et al, 2014;Gibbor et al, 2021;Justo-Henriques et al, 2021;López et al, 2022;Miranda-Castillo et al, 2013;Orrell et al, 2012;Orgeta et al, 2015), four of these studies applied to in younger aged older adults (J Alves et al, 2014;Cove et al, 2014;Justo-Henriques et al, 2021;Orgeta et al, 2015), and five administered adapted CS (Jorge Alves et al, 2014;Capotosto et al, 2017;Cove et al, 2014;Gibbor et al, 2021;…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Two of them applied participants living in a community and within group (Alvares-Pereira et al, 2021;J Alves et al, 2014;Capotosto et al, 2017;Cove et al, 2014;Gibbor et al, 2021;Justo-Henriques et al, 2021;López et al, 2022;Miranda-Castillo et al, 2013;Orrell et al, 2012;Orgeta et al, 2015), four of these studies applied to in younger aged older adults (J Alves et al, 2014;Cove et al, 2014;Justo-Henriques et al, 2021;Orgeta et al, 2015), and five administered adapted CS (Jorge Alves et al, 2014;Capotosto et al, 2017;Cove et al, 2014;Gibbor et al, 2021;López et al, 2022). Of all studies applying a higher number of sessions, three studies involved in community-dwelling participants (Cove et al, 2014;López et al, 2020;Orgeta et al, 2015) and all of them but one in European participants (Miranda-Castillo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los datos obtenidos indican que, la puntuación antes y después de la aplicación del programa de estimulación, en líneas generales ha mejorado. Esta mejoría obtenida en el MEC es similar a la encontrada en la literatura sobre la aplicación de un programa de estimulación en pacientes con DTA (López et al, 2020;Tárrega, 1998). Por otro lado, los sujetos con DTA sin la aplicación de un programa de estimulación, la media del rendimiento cognitivo general por año, fue de 4,2 puntos, puntuación que está muy por debajo de la encontrada en los estudios sobre la aplicación de los programas de estimulación (Yesavage y Sheikh, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Por tanto, parece ser que una alta actividad física podría ser un factor protector contra el deterioro cognitivo. En esta línea es importante destacar, tal y como se mencionó anteriormente, que mantener hábitos de vida saludables controlarían el riesgo de padecer un trastorno neurocognitivo leve o mayor (López et al, 2020). Esto es coincidente con las investigaciones de Cuesta et al (2019) y Redolat-Iborra et al (2012 donde se evidencia que un estilo de vida saludable actúa como mecanismo de protección ante las demencias.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified