2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual for Anxiety in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
195
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
195
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…34,35,39,40,42,43 As shown in Fig 2, CBT was superior to control conditions for anxiety symptoms in children with ASD as reported by the parents (random effects model ES = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.23 to 2.14; z = 2.44, P = .02; fixed effect model ES = 0.78). However, one study 35 had an ES estimate (d = 4.34) that was much larger than that of the other studies (range, d = 0.10-1.23).…”
Section: Parent-rated Anxietymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…34,35,39,40,42,43 As shown in Fig 2, CBT was superior to control conditions for anxiety symptoms in children with ASD as reported by the parents (random effects model ES = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.23 to 2.14; z = 2.44, P = .02; fixed effect model ES = 0.78). However, one study 35 had an ES estimate (d = 4.34) that was much larger than that of the other studies (range, d = 0.10-1.23).…”
Section: Parent-rated Anxietymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Eight studies 34,35,[39][40][41][42][43][44] involving 469 participants (252 treatment, 217 comparison) met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 45 flow diagram of study selection is shown in Fig 1. The characteristics of the 8 included studies are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An independent clinical evaluator (ICE) who was not involved in data collection or in direct implementation of the intervention, reviewed de-identified copies of each participant's ADIS-P-IV and BASC-2 summary sheets at pre-and post-treatment to complete the CGI-S and CGI-I ratings. This method is similar to the methods described in previous studies (e.g., Storch et al, 2013). Participants obtaining a CGI-I of 0, 1, or 2 were considered to be positive treatment responders.…”
Section: Blind Rater Outcome Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these emotional difficulties, and evidence that ER ability serves protective factors such as prosocial peer engagement (Jahromi, Bryce, & Swanson, 2013), there has been increased interest in assessing the effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in youth with ASD, which until now has focused almost exclusively on anxiety (e.g., Ehrenreich-May et al, 2014;Reaven, Blakeley-Smith, Culhane-Shelburne, & Hepburn, 2012;Sofronoff, Attwood, & Hinton, 2005;Storch et al, 2013;Wood, Fujii, Renno, & Dyke, 2014). Although research exists documenting deficits in ER in individuals with ASD compared to peers (Mazefsky et al, 2013), empirical evaluations of ER interventions are needed (Sofronoff, Beaumont, & Weiss, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%