2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Chronic Pain Intensity on Sit-to-Stand Strategy in Patients With Herniated Lumbar Disks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These proved that their pelvis kinematics are less efficient due to poor proprioception and probably pain-avoiding mechanisms. That background was confirmed in a different study where we observed that chronic pain intensity played an important role in decreasing ground reaction peak force and increasing time to peak in the sit-to-stand task in LBP patients [38]. This study suggested three main directions for rehabilitation programs: pain reduction, postural improvement, and the coordination of the sit-to-stand strategy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These proved that their pelvis kinematics are less efficient due to poor proprioception and probably pain-avoiding mechanisms. That background was confirmed in a different study where we observed that chronic pain intensity played an important role in decreasing ground reaction peak force and increasing time to peak in the sit-to-stand task in LBP patients [38]. This study suggested three main directions for rehabilitation programs: pain reduction, postural improvement, and the coordination of the sit-to-stand strategy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It was assumed that the extension pattern of STS could be used in decreasing the VGRF in the general pain population patients. Avoidance behavior in STS execution was presented in CLBP patients, in high pain individuals only, indicating that chronic pain intensity was a significant factor in decreasing ground reaction peak force and increasing time to peak force [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2,1 ) indicated that the measurements of VGRF and events times in STS had high and good reproducibility [11]. The Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that the results concerning the forces and the event times were normally distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As part of our aim to distinguish elderly from younger participants, the procedure divided the raising phase into two parts: the first one lasting from initiation until peak vGRF (T1), and the second one from peak vGRF until rebound (T2). Sipko et al proposed a similar approach using the vGRF to identify the subsequent events in their study about patients with chronic low back pain [30]. -Stabilization phase: the period between rebound (upright posture) and the achievement of the SS.…”
Section: Ground Reaction Forcementioning
confidence: 99%