1973
DOI: 10.1136/gut.14.10.753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cholecystectomy on bile salt metabolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
5

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
70
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such high ratios have been reported for gallstone patients with nonvisualizing gallbladder in one (5) but not another study (43), for cholecystectomized gallstone patients in some (41,44) but not other studies (21,45), and for some conditions with a high risk of gallstone formation such as partial resection of the ileum (46) or hyperlipidemia type Ilb or IV (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such high ratios have been reported for gallstone patients with nonvisualizing gallbladder in one (5) but not another study (43), for cholecystectomized gallstone patients in some (41,44) but not other studies (21,45), and for some conditions with a high risk of gallstone formation such as partial resection of the ileum (46) or hyperlipidemia type Ilb or IV (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…42 A causal association has been supported by the mechanisms after cholecystectomy, which include a continuous bile flow into the bowel. 43,44 The predilection of the right-side colon has been suggested through a greater proximal colonic absorption of fecal secondary bile acids, 15 which have been considered carcinogenic for a long time. 45,46 An altered activity of colonic microbiota after cholecystectomy, including an increased bacterial degradation of bile acids into fecal secondary bile acids has also been suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(26 -28) Cholecystectomy results in increased fecal excretion of secondary bile acids due to an increase in the bile acid pool in the enterohepatic circulation and increased degradation of primary bile acids. (29,30) Low concentrations of serum total or LDL cholesterol have been related to increased risk of colon cancer in many prospective studies. (31) Whereas this inverse association has generally been ascribed to the effect of preclinical cancer existing at the baseline, (31) an increased risk of proximal colon cancer associated with low cholesterol levels persisted 10-20 years later in a prospective study of Japanese people in Hawaii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%