2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of child support on the labor supply of custodial mothers participating in TANF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of women experiencing TANF, when fathers substitute formal supports for informal supports, women and their children receive fewer benefits owing to the requirement that they assign their rights to child support to the state. There is increasing evidence that allowing custodial, TANF recipients to keep child support payments has no effect on women's participation in the labor force (i.e., does not detract from the welfare-to-work schema) [22,123], may reduce family conflict such as child abuse [124], and increases the likelihood that paternity will be established [125]. In light of the rising number of single-parent families in the United States [126] and TANF's social goals, the potential benefits of maintaining a mandatory child support participation policy and providing limited monetary pass-throughs should be reconsidered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of women experiencing TANF, when fathers substitute formal supports for informal supports, women and their children receive fewer benefits owing to the requirement that they assign their rights to child support to the state. There is increasing evidence that allowing custodial, TANF recipients to keep child support payments has no effect on women's participation in the labor force (i.e., does not detract from the welfare-to-work schema) [22,123], may reduce family conflict such as child abuse [124], and increases the likelihood that paternity will be established [125]. In light of the rising number of single-parent families in the United States [126] and TANF's social goals, the potential benefits of maintaining a mandatory child support participation policy and providing limited monetary pass-throughs should be reconsidered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the absence of child support payments, resident parents may increase their participation in the labor market, which ultimately means that our measure of pre‐child support income is not entirely accurate. While there is very little research on the effects of child support in Latin America, and virtually no study that has looked at the effect of child support on resident parents' labor supply, recent evidence for the USA indicates that nonresident parents' monetary transfers do not affect resident parents' likelihood of working for pay and or the number of hours worked (Cuesta & Cancian, ). A second limitation is that we are not accounting for the effects of child support payments on children living with nonresident parents who are paying child support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worsened postunion dissolution outcomes among children have been linked to a wide variety of factors, including parental conflict and parenting styles, non-coresident fathers' involvement, and economic hardship (Amato and Gilbreth 1999;Cuesta and Cancian 2015;Cuesta and Meyer 2014;Holden and Smock 1991;Jenkins 2008;Kiernan and Hobcraft 1997). However, the expected direction of postseparation or divorce outcomes cannot be directly predicted.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since it partly depends on behavioral responses from custodial mothers, the final results are ambiguous. In order to compensate for their loss of income and other economic resources, mothers might increase their labor supply, move to a smaller house, return to their household of origin, or repartner (Amato 2000;Cuesta and Cancian 2015;Mooney, Oliver, and Smith 2009;Jenkins 2008;Liu, Esteve, and Treviño 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%