2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00829.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Child Support Enforcement on Abortion in the United States*

Abstract: Income transfer policies such as child support enforcement can affect certain fertility outcomes such as abortion rates across the states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, find higher birthrates associated with WIC, but no effects on fertility (Lopoo & Raissian, 2012). Crowley et al (2012) report lower abortion rates in the states with stronger child support enforcement. find higher birthrates associated with WIC program, and in their review of the literature on natalist policies in the United States, Lopoo and Raissian (2012) conclude that many public policies have affected the fertility choices of families.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, find higher birthrates associated with WIC, but no effects on fertility (Lopoo & Raissian, 2012). Crowley et al (2012) report lower abortion rates in the states with stronger child support enforcement. find higher birthrates associated with WIC program, and in their review of the literature on natalist policies in the United States, Lopoo and Raissian (2012) conclude that many public policies have affected the fertility choices of families.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Crowley et al. () report lower abortion rates in the states with stronger child support enforcement. Hoynes et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antiabortion activists at the state level have sought legislation requiring that abortion providers hold admitting privileges to local hospitals. Others have sought legislation requiring that women receive counseling (and in some cases with mandatory sonograms) and undergo postcounseling waiting periods before abortion services can be provided (Meier and McFarlane 1992;Medoff 2002;Crowley, Jagannathan, and Falchettore 2012).…”
Section: Geographic Distribution Of Pcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that child support payments stabilize incomes, despite payment irregularity (Ha, Cancian, & Meyer, 2011), and that women who receive child support are more likely to leave welfare and less likely to return (Huang & Han, 2012). Stronger child support enforcement systems are associated with decreased non-marital teenage fertility (Plotnick et al 2004;Hao, Astone, & Cherlin, 2007), as well as decreased nonmarital fertility generally (Garfinkel, Huang, McLanahan, & Gaylin, 2003;Plotnick et al 2007) and lower abortion rates (Crowley, Jagannathan, & Falchettore, 2012). Stronger enforcement has also been associated with an increased likelihood that non-custodial parents (NCPs) select partners with higher levels of education (Aizer & McLanahan, 2006).…”
Section: Background and Related Research On Compliance With Support Omentioning
confidence: 99%