The effect of chief sustainability officers on sustainability reporting—A management perspective

Abstract

More and more companies worldwide are appointing a chief sustainability officer (CSO) to anchor the topic of sustainability at the top management level. This study examines how a CSO on the management board influences the quantity and quality of sustainability reports. While quantity is measured by the amount of information disclosed (sustainability disclosure), quality is measured as the decision for external assurance of the sustainability report, using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines as a reporting framework and publishing a combined report. Using a sample of German listed companies for the years 2017-2020, regression analysis is first conducted to analyse the impact of CSOs on sustainability reports. Second, the study shows how a chief executive officer (CEO) and a chief financial officer (CFO) impact sustainability reports when they also serve as CSOs. The results suggest that CSOs improve sustainability disclosure. In addition, a CSO positively impacts the decision for external assurance of the sustainability report but shows no impact on using the GRI guidelines and publishing a combined report. The results also show that a CFO positively influences sustainability disclosure, while a CEO does not. This study contributes to the growing literature on sustainable governance and how having a CSO on the management board impacts sustainability reporting. The study has numerous implications for regulators and practitioners. The most important insight is which management position should be responsible for sustainability to improve reporting and the limitations of that decision.

The influence of board characteristics, ownership structure and public attention on climate change disclosure in banking sector companies

“…Several previous studies have examined in depth the topic of environmental disclosure in a corporate context, highlighting important aspects such as carbon, water, waste, energy, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) (Ali et al, 2024;Gerber et al, 2024;Peng & Chandarasupsang, 2023;Srouji et al, 2023;Thun & Zülch, 2023;Wicaksono & Setiawan, 2024). Nevertheless, the main attention in research often focuses on aspects of emissions disclosure (Elsayih et al, 2021;Khalid et al, 2023;Kılıç & Kuzey, 2019).…”

Pengaruh Karakteristik Dewan Terhadap Kualitas Pelaporan Keberlanjutan Perusahaan di Industri Sumber Daya Alam di Bursa Efek Indonesia

“…Digunakan empat karakteristik dewan untuk menganalisis pengaruh tata kelola terhadap kualitas pelaporan keberlanjutan, yaitu keberagaman gender dewan direksi, independensi dewan komisaris, ukuran dewan direksi, dan pengalaman dewan direksi. Pemilihan variabel ini konsisten dengan literatur tata kelola kontemporer (Elaigwu et al, 2024;Erin et al, 2022;Githaiga & Kosgei, 2023;Kumar et al, 2022;Rudyanto & Veronica Siregar, 2018;Saepudin et al, 2021;Thun & Zülch, 2023). Erin et al (2022) serta Githaiga & Kosgei (2023) menemukan adanya pengaruh positif keberagaman gender dewan direksi terhadap pelaporan keberlanjutan.…”

Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets

“…Hussain et al, 2018). An outcome of these discussions has been an increasing number of sustainability committees in companies (Thun & Zülch, 2023).…”